> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In short, the main decision has been to drop entirely python2.x-foo
> packages. They will, however, be provided as virtual packages, but only
> if something actually needs them.
> ...
> For C extensions, it was decided to build them for all av
On 5/16/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 17:04 -0300, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> > Matthias has some updates on python-central on his laptop and he should
> > upload it somewhere so that we can take a look.
>
> Ok, but what's the point here? Are we going to d
On 5/16/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 13:48 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> We agreed to switch to python-2.4 in the week following debconf (next week
> that is) and go on with whatever we have at that time.
I'm afraid Matthias hasn't agreed to that. H
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 17:04 -0300, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> > Matthias has some updates on python-central on his laptop and he should
> > upload it somewhere so that we can take a look.
>
> Ok, but what's the point here? Are we going to drop python-support
> usage ? Will python-central provides
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 13:48 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> We agreed to switch to python-2.4 in the week following debconf (next week
> that is) and go on with whatever we have at that time.
I'm afraid Matthias hasn't agreed to that. He has agreed to upload
python-defaults v2.4 once we have i
On 5/16/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I think the Python BoF happened, so is there a thread somewhere with
> what was discussed, a wiki article or even a blog entry ? I trust that
> the guys involved took non insane decisions but i wou
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I think the Python BoF happened, so is there a thread somewhere with
> what was discussed, a wiki article or even a blog entry ? I trust that
> the guys involved took non insane decisions but i would like to know,
> since we've more than 50 packages to k
On 5/13/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-05-10 às 22:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu:
> In the mean time, I'm working on packaging the stuff needed by TG 0.9;
I finished the first working packaging of TurboGears 0.9, and uploaded a
tarball with all the p
On 5/4/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Em Qui, 2006-05-04 às 10:38 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> I think you can do that, but since it's isn't our default option (we
> usually keep just debian/ for those who don't know yet) it can confuse
> people working on this package
On 5/13/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > How about, right now, just a statement "this is what the issues are".
> > Or even, "this [URL here] is the mailing list post where the issues
> > are outlined."
>
> I forgot about them. So, I need
Hi,
last night I prepared an updated libapache2-mod-python package. If
you're running unstable, and use libapache2-mod-python, please give
it a try and report feedback.
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/temp/libapache2-mod-python/
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
11 matches
Mail list logo
