Re: Python 2.1/2.2 removal; Python 2.4 as default

2006-04-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:41:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > So, because there were no objections to the python 2.1/2.2 removal, > I'll be proceeding with that. Done now, I'd like to announce this, together with some warning about default python version changes, if they're going to hap

Re: Python 2.1/2.2 removal; Python 2.4 as default

2006-04-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > The first freezes are already closing in fast, > > did I miss something? There's no update since > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html We're roughly 16 weeks from th

Re: Python 2.1/2.2 removal; Python 2.4 as default

2006-04-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Matthias Klose wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > The first freezes are already closing in fast, > > did I miss something? There's no update since > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html Yes. At least the January, 3rd one (http://lists.debian.org/debian-deve

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > the status of pyenchant ? It's a gaupol dependency, right ? Sounds > like a "python-modules" valid candidate. There is an ITP bug reported against this package (package itself is available at mentors.debian.net), but it is little old - there are 2 new upstream

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > > But I would really like turbogears maintained within "python-modules" since > > it's mainly good glue between several general-purpose Python modules. > > Does gaupol [1] qualify? It is rather standalone application than a > python module but I would

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 4/11/06, Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Yeah, "pkg-python" would be just core python. But "python-modules" is more > > general purpose. > > > > > Just want to make sure I understand the thread, python package projects, > > > like pkg-turboge

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Yeah, "pkg-python" would be just core python. But "python-modules" is more > general purpose. > > > Just want to make sure I understand the thread, python package projects, > > like pkg-turbogears are to remain separate? > > But I would really like turbogear

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Bob Tanner wrote: > > OK, thanks to everyone who volunteered so far. There's already a > > pkg-python Alioth project and an associated SVN repository. Right now it's > > empty but Matthias will start using it this week-end (if all goes well). > > This is just for core python r

Re: Python-modules policy document + announce

2006-04-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I completed the documentation of the python-modules alioth project. > > > > Please check out: > > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html > > maybe add a layout for the sv

Re: Python-modules policy document + announce

2006-04-11 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 4/11/06, Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > I completed the documentation of the python-modules alioth project. > > How does this new project effect existing projects like pkg-turbogears? > Good question. You can keep with pkg-turbogear

Re: Python-modules policy document + announce

2006-04-11 Thread Bob Tanner
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I completed the documentation of the python-modules alioth project. How does this new project effect existing projects like pkg-turbogears? -- Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Lin

Re: New python maintenance team

2006-04-11 Thread Bob Tanner
Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Who would be interested to help ? > > OK, thanks to everyone who volunteered so far. There's already a > pkg-python Alioth project and an associated SVN repository. Right now it's > empty but Matthias will start using it this week-end (if all goes well). This is just fo

Re: Python-modules policy document + announce

2006-04-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Raphael Hertzog writes: > Hello everybody, > > I completed the documentation of the python-modules alioth project. > > Please check out: > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html maybe add a layout for the svn structure? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: cdbs to remove *.pyc on clean?

2006-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:59:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I have a question on the bug report #252134 "cdbs: python-distutils.mk > should remove .pyc files on clean". It seems that python setup.py > clean actually creates a number .pyc files itself, and quite a number > of packages th