> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think everyone is agreed that we want greater automization of python
> transitions, but the longer this is postponed, the more problematic this
> becomes for etch. It's my impression that there is enough untapped manpower
> available to work on
How are you,
A Gen_uine Coll`ege Deg.ree in 2 weeks Cal_l us now_!-> 206-202-2033
Within 2 weeks! No Study Required! 1_0_0_% Veri.fiable!
Right now the following deg.rees are being offered:
B/A, .B/S/C, .M/A,.M/S/C,.M/B/A, .P/H/D,
C.al_l us now_ for more information, 2
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm not experienced enough with Python to lead such a maintenance
> team, but I'm looking forward to such a team.
>
> Who would be interested to help ?
OK, thanks to everyone who volunteered so far. There's already a
pkg-python
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> Can we have an Alioth group created? And a TODO list, possibly, so that
> as we are already more than just "two guys" we can start working on
> something :)
There's already a python-modules Alioth project and during the BSP next
week, it may be a good ti
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:38:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> I've already re-built these two packages, removing 2.1 and 2.2 support
> and adding 2.4. However, I've been unable to find a sponsor.
Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Will update the bug reports later
today with the relevant informa
I fully agree with Joss.
Can we have an Alioth group created? And a TODO list, possibly, so that
as we are already more than just "two guys" we can start working on
something :)
~marco
Il giorno ven, 07/04/2006 alle 14.11 +0200, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
> Le vendredi 07 avril 2006 à 03:35 -0
Le vendredi 07 avril 2006 à 03:35 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> I think everyone is agreed that we want greater automization of python
> transitions, but the longer this is postponed, the more problematic this
> becomes for etch.
I can only agree. The move to python 2.4 is an urgent matter, as
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
> The first freezes are already closing in fast,
did I miss something? There's no update since
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > python-pylibacl has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
> > python-pyxattr has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
>
> I've already re-built these two packages,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:38:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > python-pylibacl has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
> > python-pyxattr has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
>
> I've already re-buil
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> python-pylibacl has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
> python-pyxattr has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
I've already re-built these two packages, removing 2.1 and 2.2 support
and adding 2.4. How
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:33 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> zopeinterface has an unsatisfied build-dependency: python2.2-dev
This package can be removed, pythonX-zopeinterface are now built
from zope3 source package.
--
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.''`.
P
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:11:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
> > On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 09:58 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > > > I'm not experienced enough with Python to lead such a maintenance
> > > > tea
Hi all,
It's been quite a while, but 2.1 and to a slightly lesser extend, 2.2
are really obsolete now. One of the issues with 2.1 and 2.2 are that
they don't build on amd64, and are holding up a whole chain of packages
also.
Therefore, I'd like to remove python 2.1 and 2.2 as soon as possible,
li
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 19:11 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm sure one or more teams could be useful, packagers should be able
> to decide on their own if they want to join a team. There are lot of
> packages, where people did ask for maintainance (i.e. python-xml), but
> got no response. On the
15 matches
Mail list logo
