Le vendredi 10 février 2006 à 16:46 +0100, Pavel Šimerda a écrit :
> > For a module that has few or zero reverse dependencies, there should be
> > one single package, named python-foo, containing the module for the
> > default python version. Anything else is just cluttering the archive.
>
> You t
> That depends ... if you need some 3rd party package/module that debian
> built only for 2.3 then yes, but if all the package/modules that you
> need have python2.4 builds in debian then you can use 2.4.
this is the case with wxWidgets and kid
> See the Python Policy for the various circumstance
On 2006-02-10 09:05, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 février 2006 à 22:57 +0100, Pavel Šimerda a écrit :
> > At first look I thought python packages in debian are called
> > python2.3-packagename and python2.4-packagename. And that there's a
> > metapackage python-packagename that requires th
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:55:57PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry, but there's a whole new generation of Debian developers here that
> > simply won't develop anything in perl, just because perl looks too
> > complex and cryptic to us. N
Le jeudi 09 février 2006 à 22:57 +0100, Pavel Šimerda a écrit :
> At first look I thought python packages in debian are called
> python2.3-packagename and python2.4-packagename. And that there's a
> metapackage python-packagename that requires the 2.3 version installed.
>
> Now I see this is not
5 matches
Mail list logo
