Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?

2006-02-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, but there's a whole new generation of Debian developers here that > simply won't develop anything in perl, just because perl looks too > complex and cryptic to us. Now, with bash, perl and python, we can deal > with the scripting needs for at l

Re: python2.3/python2.4/python packages

2006-02-09 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Pavel Šimerda wrote: | So it means debian's default version of python is 2.3 so everybody will | use python 2.3 if he wants things working? That depends ... if you need some 3rd party package/module that debian built only for 2.3 then yes, but if all

python2.3/python2.4/python packages

2006-02-09 Thread Pavel Šimerda
On 2006-02-01 21:20, Bob Tanner wrote: > Pavel ?imerda wrote: > > Hi people > > I debian/testing there's a deb package called just 'kid'. It's a very > > nice templating system for python. > > > > Debian's package 'kid' is for python2.3... so I'd maybe prefer calling it > > python2.3-kid. > > >

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-02-09 Thread Bob Tanner
Bob Tanner real-time.com> writes: > >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure. > Read and re-read the complete thread regarding .eggs in Debian and I cannot > tell if any progress has been made. > As "just a package maintainer" I was looking for the "options" to move > forward. > 1

Python-related WNPP packages

2006-02-09 Thread Seo Sanghyeon
Here's a summary of Python-related packages listed on WNPP. Perhaps you may find it useful. #173879 leo-editor: Outlining editor and literate programming #215367 pylibpcap: Python binding to libpcap #215804 ply: Lex/yacc for Python #262161 ironpython: Python implementation on .NET #265585 bitpim: