On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:05:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:34:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > If we followed the same method for python-base, then we would
> > >
> > > a) instroduce python-base iff we had some package(s) written in python
>
Cool, great.
Thanks for the reply and I'll await it's release. ;)
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Il giorno ven, 20/01/2006 alle 18.10 +0100, Ramon Bastiaans ha scritto:
Hi all,
I was wondering on the status of a version 0.7 package for python-sqlobject.
It's current package is still at version
Kevin Mark wrote:
> Giving away code (GPL or otherwise) to the world is done for many
> reasons. Aparently some folks are more concerned about how their work
> is used. As with the attribution in .debs, folks want the users to not
> associate possible (as judged by them) 'bad'/'unofficial'/'off
>
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:34:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > If we followed the same method for python-base, then we would
> >
> > a) instroduce python-base iff we had some package(s) written in python
> >that we wanted in the base system (apt-listchanges comes to min
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:40:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I asked this question earlier, and no one answered. Are there .config
> scripts being written in python today in Ubuntu? (Hmm, where are the python
> bindings for debconf, and what ensures that they're installed?)
No, not yet. Th
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:52:09AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:40:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I asked this question earlier, and no one answered. Are there .config
> > scripts being written in python today in Ubuntu? (Hmm, where are the python
> > bindings
Il giorno ven, 20/01/2006 alle 18.10 +0100, Ramon Bastiaans ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering on the status of a version 0.7 package for python-sqlobject.
> It's current package is still at version 0.6, while version 0.7 has been
> released in October 2005.
>
> It seems the package maint
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:22:53AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:38:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Ok, but now I'm confused: why is python-minimal needed in Essential?
> > Why not simply depend on it straightforwardly?
> Because there are parts of the packag
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:38:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ok, but now I'm confused: why is python-minimal needed in Essential?
> Why not simply depend on it straightforwardly?
Because there are parts of the packaging system where there is no way to
express such a dependency relationsh
Hi all,
I was wondering on the status of a version 0.7 package for python-sqlobject.
It's current package is still at version 0.6, while version 0.7 has been
released in October 2005.
It seems the package maintainer has been notified of the new version in
November 2005 through the bug report
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:47:19AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:06:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > the design decision of putting the binary-all python packages in a
> > > separate directory into /var/lib/python2.x/site-packages has s
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:58:20PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> For what it's worth, we've caught hell from the ruby community for
> breaking the standard library in to its component parts and not
> installing it all by default. This problem has been largely abrogated
> as of late, but I'd rather
Joey Hess writes:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > FWIW the relevant design docs from when this was done in Ubuntu are
> > here:
> >
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EssentialPython (requirements)
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonInEssential (details)
> >
> > The rationale for the set of included module
Joe Wreschnig writes:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:12 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I don't know what's actually in (or more importantly not in)
> > python2.4-minimal though.
>
> I'm eyeballing right now. Things that jump out at me:
> * No character encoding, translation, or locale handling.
> *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:58:20PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:47:18PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:23:30PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-1
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:06:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Josselin Mouette writes:
> > > Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 15:24 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > > > This is the right direction, and adding support for extensions makes
> > > > this complete. Does your
16 matches
Mail list logo
