Pixels That Rock

Sorry for the previous blank email. I saw your name and email address on a website and thought you might be interested in taking a look at my new site. www.pixelsthatrock.com If you are interested in trading links or something let me know. Thanks! - Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: question on having . as LOAD_PATH (ruby)

Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Sorry for the crosspost; contrary to what's said in perl-policy and > python-policy, '.' seems to be included in module search-path. I find > it uneasy considering we have quite a few tools running as root. Is > this intentional or unintentional? It doesn't seem to be the c

Re: question on having . as LOAD_PATH (ruby)

* Junichi Uekawa: > Hi perl and pyhton people, > > Sorry for the crosspost; contrary to what's said in perl-policy and > python-policy, '.' seems to be included in module search-path. I find > it uneasy considering we have quite a few tools running as root. Is > this intentional or unintentional?

Re: question on having . as LOAD_PATH (ruby)

Hi perl and pyhton people, Sorry for the crosspost; contrary to what's said in perl-policy and python-policy, '.' seems to be included in module search-path. I find it uneasy considering we have quite a few tools running as root. Is this intentional or unintentional? regards, junichi