Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

2003-09-09 Thread Ben Burton
> > - python2.1 is needed at least by zope and jython > > Would it still be needed in sarge if zope2.6.1 & jython were built > against python2.2? It's not a case of jython building against python 2.2 (in fact, it doesn't build-depend on any version of python at all). It's a case of jython provi

autoconf1.4 on escher/unstable

2003-09-09 Thread Matthias Klose
please could somebody install this? Thanks, Matthias

Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

2003-09-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 15:24, Matthias Klose wrote: > Andreas Rottmann writes: > > Hi! > > > > I wonder how long source packages that build binary packages for > > multiple versions (2.{1,2,3}) should continue to build packages for > > the old Python versions. IMHO, this should be documented somewh

Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

2003-09-09 Thread Jim Penny
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 21:27:16 +0200 Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder how long source packages that build binary packages for > multiple versions (2.{1,2,3}) should continue to build packages for > the old Python versions. IMHO, this should be documented somewhere > (P

zope 2.6.2 in Debian?

2003-09-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Now that 2.6.2 is released: - will you switch to python2.2 as the python interpreter used? - or maybe will you wait for 2.7 to be released, which uses python2.3?

Re: Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

2003-09-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Andreas Rottmann writes: > Hi! > > I wonder how long source packages that build binary packages for > multiple versions (2.{1,2,3}) should continue to build packages for > the old Python versions. IMHO, this should be documented somewhere > (Policy?). Is there any timeline how long Python 2.2 and

Support for Python2.1 and Python2.2

2003-09-09 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Hi! I wonder how long source packages that build binary packages for multiple versions (2.{1,2,3}) should continue to build packages for the old Python versions. IMHO, this should be documented somewhere (Policy?). Is there any timeline how long Python 2.2 and 2.1 should stay in the archive? Rega

Re: python (parted) question

2003-09-09 Thread Paul Telford
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Andrew Clausen wrote: > I never received your email. Ah sorry, I only posted to the debian list the first time around. Added a CC to the parted list this time as I thought it might be a better place to ask. > 1.6 is not compatible with 1.4. Where did you get python-parted f