On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 09:38, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
[...]
> pydance comes with a number of "modules", which are actually its core
> source code split into managable files. It installs these to
> /usr/share/games/pydance, and doesn't byte compile these. Based on my
> reading of this section, this is n
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 12:27, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
[...]
> I'm looking on the best way to do the soon coming python-gtk 1.2 -> 2
[...]
> * After the next release he decides to install python-gtk2 (or an app
> that need python-gtk2) by apt-get install python-gtk2 (or app).
> => The default bin
Hello,
I'm looking on the best way to do the soon coming python-gtk 1.2 -> 2
transition (for more details about that:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2003/debian-python-200308/msg00031.html).
The transition will be ok for unstable, but what about the next stable ?
A summarize the proble
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 07:09, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> In order to make it up to date, and to match current packaging
> practices, I have prepared a draft for a python policy update.
> It is available at: http://people.debian.org/~joss/python/
>
> It includes clarifications, a new section on bytec
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:26:36PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > The .py's in /usr/lib/straw are detected as python modules to be
> > bytecompiled for the default python version, i.e. 2.3. Maybe you should
> > put them in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages.
> Ah, I see. This is a shame, they are pri
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-23 14:59]:
> Just saw, that 0.8 is already 20 months old. Somebody volunteering to
> package the current version?
BTW, I just orphaned this package. So if someone's interested in
taking it, go ahead. Otherwise, if someone uploads the current
version,
Package: python-pmw
Just saw, that 0.8 is already 20 months old. Somebody volunteering to
package the current version?
7 matches
Mail list logo
