On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Donovan Baarda writes:
> > Does anyone want me to contibute some code to try and do this? I think
> > the "python-central" stuff has most of the code to handle this, it just
> > needs a little bit of tweaking.
>
> sure, that would b
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:45:29PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 10/08/2003 ? 16:12, Lars Wirzenius a ?crit :
> > Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2 as
> > well is not a good solution in my opinion. It prevents, for example,
> > being able to use the packag
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 05:26:23PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> > (There will be a problem when the default version of Python changes. I
> > don't think we have a way to deal with that.)
>
> Why not simply call compileall.py for each dirctory in the PYTHONPATH
>
Le dim 10/08/2003 à 16:12, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2 as
> well is not a good solution in my opinion. It prevents, for example,
> being able to use the package on woody, even if it is uploaded only into
> stable. (This happens to be
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> import pygtk
>> pygtk.require('1.2')
>
> Will this also cover using gnome 1 bindings instead of gnome 2?
Yes, these two line specify that you want to use gtk and gnome 1
bindings instead of the gnome 2 ones.
> I assume that just prepending the above two l
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 18:40, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> For the moment the default python bindings for gtk/gnome are 1.2
> version. It means that an "import gtk" in a .py will load gtk1.2.
>
> It's time to switch gtk/gnome 2 as the default bindings.
> So all pygtk/gnome 1.2 programs have to use th
Hi, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> (There will be a problem when the default version of Python changes. I
> don't think we have a way to deal with that.)
Why not simply call compileall.py for each dirctory in the PYTHONPATH
from "python"s postinst?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de
On su, 2003-08-10 at 15:56, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If you can provide a good solution to achieve this, it will surely be
> welcome. In the meantime, please don't do what you describe with
> packages shipping .py files. You should depend on python (>= 2.3),
> python (<< 2.4) - this can be done au
I subscribe debian-python. Please don't Cc me when you reply to the
list.
On su, 2003-08-10 at 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
> > Um, yeah, it does contain a .pyc. I don't think it should: the postinst
> > compiles the eoc.py file. The inclusion of the .pyc file seems like a
Le dim 10/08/2003 à 14:44, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> There are probably some packages that have "Depends: python" that work
> with a whole variety of versions of python. Provided they compile their
> modules with "/usr/bin/python" in their postinst, and remove the pyc's
> and pyo's in their postrm
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 17:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
> debian-python that I have something as a reference.
[...]
> > As far as I know, it already works with Python 2.3. And 2.2. And 2.1. I
> > like the fact that the same package works
Hi,
I need the python-xml package to rebuild some of my packages
(python-gtk, python-gtk2, python-gnome2, python-pyorbit, rubrica), but
python-xml is away from unstable because of transition.
Several packages use python-gtk/gtk2, so I would upload these packages
today, but I don't know what's t
Le sam 09/08/2003 à 20:39, Pete Shinners a écrit :
> hello all. i am the developer of pygame and a debian/sid user. (note,
> the debian package is maintained by ed boraas, not me.)
>
> i noticed yesterday an upgrade to some python package is blocked by
> pygame (at least what i can tell). i can'
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> Um, yeah, it does contain a .pyc. I don't think it should: the postinst
> compiles the eoc.py file. The inclusion of the .pyc file seems like a
> bug due to unforeseen interaction with the upstream Makefile's install
> target. I'll have to remove the .pyc from the .deb in t
On su, 2003-08-10 at 10:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
> debian-python that I have something as a reference.
ACK. (I'm on -python, so further Cc's are not necessary.)
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
> > As far as I know, it already works with
This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
debian-python that I have something as a reference.
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> On la, 2003-08-09 at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Please upgrade your packages soon, or ask on debian-python for NMU's or
> > help.
> > If the package d
16 matches
Mail list logo
