Re: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing

2003-06-25 Thread Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > emulating the BDB 1.85 API can be done using the db_185.h header of > the libdb4.1-dev package, not sure about the BDB on-disk format. Emulating the API is irrelevant. In Python 2.3, the bsddb package will emulate the bsddb module API. Using db_185.h o

Re: pkg-zope on alioth (english, more or less).

2003-06-25 Thread Michel Grentzinger
Le Lundi 23 Juin 2003 21:51, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis a écrit : > Hi all, > I've set up an alioth project for collaborative maintainership of various > zope* packages. I don't think i should explain how much productive and > useful it would be (all zope* packages in the same place with free a

See my newest=?ISO-8859-1?b?IG1vdmll?=

2003-06-25 Thread Samuel Daugherty
Get larger balls and penís, more pleasure, more satisfaction Check it out here Remove me from the list

Can I make =?iso-8859-1?b?aXQgdXAgdG8geQ==?=ou?

2003-06-25 Thread Mitchel Gipson
Get larger balls and penís, more pleasure, more satisfaction Read about it here Remove me from the list

Re: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing

2003-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
"Martin v. Löwis" writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > Next thing to investigate, if the archives generated by the gdbm > > implementation are binary compatible with the ones created by the > > libdb1 implementation... > > Most definitely not: gdbm produces a different binary format than > db1 (whi