On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:37:44PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
> > fixed.
>
> It is in fact not installable in unstable because libpanel-applet0 is
> no longer available. I'll fix this with a new upload today.
Done, new
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python-gnome (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 183250 [ ] python-gnome: Package un-installable
>
> Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
> fixed.
It
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python-omniorb2 (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 187079 [ ] python-omniorb2_2.0-2(unstable/arm): missing build-depends
fix in incoming
bastian
--
Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: gnue-designer (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 167973 [ ] gnue-designer_0.1.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing
> build-depends?
Bah, thought I had closed this one, sorry!
> 171332 [
gnue-designer is now binary all. This bug is from before I took over
the package and I completely redid the packaging when I took it over.
Closing this bug.
--
I have a habit of wearing my mind on my sleeve.
I have a history of losing my shirt.
- Barenaked Ladies.
Hi.
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>>Upstream is dead since >1 year, too, and still advertises the thing as
>>incompatible with recent zope. IIRC, there have been 0 CVS commits on SF for a
>>year and 1 post on the mailing li
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Upstream is dead since >1 year, too, and still advertises the thing as
> incompatible with recent zope. IIRC, there have been 0 CVS commits on SF for a
> year and 1 post on the mailing list. (Even though it's unfortunate because I
>
Ron writes:
> > What about removing wxwindows2.3 from unstable. AFAICR this was a
> > "development" release anyway. Same for 2.2, no other packages seem to
> > depend on this version anymore.
>
> Yes, they are certainly candidates for removal asap. When I looked
> yesterday poedit still showed up
Howdy,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wxwindows2.2 and 2.4 I see two RC reports. Any chance to fix these
> soon?
The biggest issue with them IMO is the png mess, and the right fix to
avoid thrashing on all sides is probably to transition them to gtk2
sooner
Hi.
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: zope-worldpilot (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 122653 [ ] zope-worldpilot: please rebuild with new python packages.
> 67644 [ ] Dependency error in zope-worldpilot
> This package looks rotten. I'll file a reques
Previously Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python2.2-ztutils (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 171122 [ ] python2.2-ztutils: missing python module ExtensionClass
>
> Wichert, you even replied on the report ...
I uploaded a fix which was rejected and which
Hi,
For wxwindows2.2 and 2.4 I see two RC reports. Any chance to fix these
soon?
What about removing wxwindows2.3 from unstable. AFAICR this was a
"development" release anyway. Same for 2.2, no other packages seem to
depend on this version anymore.
Thanks, Matthias
This list may be incomplete, but at least all these bugs keep the
python packages out of testing. It seems that all these bugs can be
easily fixed ...
Do you know of other python dependent packages with RC reports?
Matthias
Package: gnue-designer (debian/main)
Maintainer: Jeff Bailey <[E
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:20:22AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> G'day,
>
> just going through my old inbox messages that didn't seem to be replied
> to;
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 13:11, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Well, thanks! I had forgotten about this. I'm no longer sure what
prompted my que
14 matches
Mail list logo
