On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 09:14:58PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:43:12AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > In the end, I suspect it would be just as easy or easier to
> > re-structure mailman to put it's modules in
> > /usr/lib/python/site-packages.
>
> then normal python
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:43:12AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> In the end, I suspect it would be just as easy or easier to
> re-structure mailman to put it's modules in
> /usr/lib/python/site-packages.
then normal python programs would be able to import the mailman module.
wouldnt that be a bad
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 07:48:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Some comments:
>
> - python-central should have a configuration option, how files are
> compiled. Most users don't need compilation with -O. Maybe
> a debconf option?
Hmm, could be done I guess, but this is already more than th
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
Debian is used as a development system for portable apps. Many developers
need to test their software works with Python 2.1.
4 matches
Mail list logo