Re: python2.2 for sarge?

2002-07-26 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:40:02AM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > fre 2002-07-26 klockan 03.31 skrev Donovan Baarda: > > If people are using the "simple wrapper" approach to supporting the default > > Python, then switching to 2.2 would just consist of releasing empty wrapper > > packages with chan

Re: Bytecode compilation

2002-07-26 Thread Dave Swegen
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:21:07PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote: > Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > install python2.2 + friends on a 486 with 16 meg'o'ram :) Maybe it would > > be an idea to provide a script that the user can run when he feels the > > machine isn't needed for anything e

Re: python2.2 for sarge?

2002-07-26 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Il gio, 2002-07-25 alle 21:20, Matthias Klose ha scritto: > some packages do have problems to built with 2.2 (packages which are > not updated for a loong time ...) do we need them in sarge? if they can't be ported to 2.2/2.3 upstream maybe they are not maintained. and if they are not maintained

Re: python2.2 for sarge?

2002-07-26 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-07-26 klockan 03.31 skrev Donovan Baarda: > If people are using the "simple wrapper" approach to supporting the default > Python, then switching to 2.2 would just consist of releasing empty wrapper > packages with changed dependancies... pretty easy NMU stuff. > > If people are screaming