Re: Emacs in build-depends of python2.1

2002-06-24 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Converting a hack to another hack with no strong reason nor fun is not > exactly what I dream of every night. > > So, I am not sure that such a conversion would be worth the time spent. > If despite all of this you still want to tackle on this task and have > some ELisp questions (I think it

Re: Emacs in build-depends of python2.1

2002-06-24 Thread Florent Rougon
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > python2.1 (2.1.3-3) from sid > py2texi.el is a generated file > it is included in debian/patches/info-docs.dpatch > the fixinfo.el is replaced by it, fixinfo.el is not run. OK, py2texi and fixinfo have nothing in common. > Dont know, seems that a l

slightly update python-gnome2 and python-gtk2 package

2002-06-24 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
I just uploaded a slightly updated python-gnome2 and python-gtk2 packages to http://klecker.debian.org/~tca . They are apt-get'able using: deb http://klecker.debian.org/~tca unstable main deb-src http://klecker.debian.org/~tca unstable main -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GNU Solfege -

Re: python bindings for orbit 2

2002-06-24 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 09:52, Roland Mas wrote: > Also, this is a pre-RFA: if someone (possibly Tom Cato Amundsen, > possibly someone else) wishes to adopt python-orbit, please go ahead. > There is currently one reported bug, which has been forwarded to > upstream. Unfortunately it seems that sa

Re: Bug#148415: jack: should use #!/usr/bin/python

2002-06-24 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Not OK, since the locally-installed Python may not/will not have > access to jack's site-python files. Using /usr/bin/env python is IMHO > only acceptable if the package is self-contained or munges sys.path to > include any non-standard modules in the search path. > indeed. If you have pyt