On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 03:16:24PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
| >> why is this so messy? You only compile for one python version
| >> and you match the upstream in either case. The existing software
| >> works perfectly without change in both cases. Seems like
| >> everyone wins here.
|
>>
>> why is this so messy? You only compile for one python version and you match
>> the upstream in either case. The existing software works perfectly without
>> change in both cases. Seems like everyone wins here.
>>
>
> Ok, not messy, but the most "complicated", since programs that depend
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 00:08, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > ===
> > 3.
> > ===
> > Quite messy, but...
> > Since python-gtk2 require python2.2 or later, we let python2.1-gtk
> > install as upstream does (in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/) and
> > install python2.2-gtk in /usr/lib/python2.2
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 00:07, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Hello,
> ===
> 4.
> ===
> Please add..., there is probably something I have missed.
Now I remember what #4 was:
Let both python2.2-gtk and python2.2-gtk2 install into
/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages, and let the packages conflict with
each
>
> ===
> 3.
> ===
> Quite messy, but...
> Since python-gtk2 require python2.2 or later, we let python2.1-gtk
> install as upstream does (in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/) and
> install python2.2-gtk in /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/gtk1.2/. And
> python2.2-gtk2 can install as upstream doe
Hello,
I think we should discuss and decide how to do the packaging of python
bindings for gtk+ 2.0 and GNOME 2. This because of namespace crash
between both gtk+ 1.2/2.0 bindings and GNOME 1.4/2.0 bindings. (When I
talk about the old bindings I mean python-gtk 0.6.9 and python-gnome
1.4.2. The new
6 matches
Mail list logo
