"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Does this sound better?
>>
>
> definately. Although I am still confused about why I can not build the 4suite
Well, I've just realized that all links are in the Windows format, with
backslashes :/
On 07-Apr-2002 Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
> of prerendered 4suite docs.
> I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
> happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
> to make the package conflict on the previous ve
Hi,
It seems that 4suite people ship a tarball
of prerendered 4suite docs.
I think I can release it sepearately. Since the conflicts
happen only when the docs are built, I can both avoid
to make the package conflict on the previous version
and avoid to render the documentation.
Doe
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
>> not a lot
>> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
>> ?
>> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
>> >>
>> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> >> an upload might be safe ...
>> >
>> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>> >
>>
>> consider people using it a
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry writes:
> >>
> >> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
> >> an upload might be safe ...
> >
> > Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
> >
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
with this arg
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>>> an upload might be safe ...
>>
>> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>>
>
> consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian
>>
>> apt-cache showpkg doesn't show any reverse dependencies for 4suite, so
>> an upload might be safe ...
>
> Well, some api changed. It might not be reasonnable ...
>
consider people using it as a depends for software not in Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can also add:
>> Build-Conflicts: python2.1-4suite (<< 0.11.99), python2.2-4suite (<<
>> 0.11.99)
>>
>> But I don't like doing this.
>
> well, that's only a problem on _your_ machine :-) autobuilders don't
> have this package installed anyway
Jérôme Marant writes:
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> > distutils yet to tackle it.
>
> I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
> know what can be done with distut
>
> I have one more question: AJ wants to release Woody in May, so there are
> not a lot
> of weeks left. What can I do with 4suite since it is quite broken in Woody
> ?
> Should I release this pre0.12 or should I stick with 0.11.1 ?
>
damned if you do, damned if you don't. 0.12 uses a
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we SHOULD be able to fix this ourselves, I just do not know enough about
> distutils yet to tackle it.
I asked about this on the 4suite mailing list because I don't really
know what can be done with distutils (if ever it can be done with the
12 matches
Mail list logo
