Re: Removal of python1.5?

2001-12-12 Thread Jim Penny
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:26:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > hmm, then we have to keep zope 2.1 as well (the version from > potato). Why do you want to keep 2.3, not 2.2? Why not 2.5? IMO If you ^ Because it is only

Re: Packages not making it into testing

2001-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Tille, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011212 08:24]: > I'm especially curious about the packages of Mike Goldman which > seems to be MIA because he did not respond on any of my postings. All of his zope packages are orphaned now. Check WNPP for a listing. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Removal of python1.5?

2001-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
hmm, then we have to keep zope 2.1 as well (the version from potato). Why do you want to keep 2.3, not 2.2? Why not 2.5? IMO If you have a mission critical application, which is incompatible among zope versions, then you should install your own zope. Am I wrong here? Jim Penny writes: > I have a z

Re: Packages not making it into testing

2001-12-12 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > zope-pythonmethod is essentially superceded by Script (python), > > which entered zope as a non-optional component in release 2.3. > > > > This is a good candidate for removal. (There are some minor API > > changes, but pythonmethods are now receiv