Re: Build-Depends-Indep

2001-11-07 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 07-Nov-2001 Danie Roux wrote: > Policy states that you should Build-Depends on python2.1-dev. > > Can this also be Build-Depends-Indep? I have a "Architecture: all" > package. It's just 3 python files. No need for "Architecture: any" > of course it can. We usually say "Build-Depends" when w

Build-Depends-Indep

2001-11-07 Thread Danie Roux
Policy states that you should Build-Depends on python2.1-dev. Can this also be Build-Depends-Indep? I have a "Architecture: all" package. It's just 3 python files. No need for "Architecture: any" -- Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread Florian Weimer
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we do agree that the License of Python 2.1.1, according to the > FSF, is compatible with the GPL ? Yes! > This section is incorrect, in that Python 1.6.1 has yet another > different license. It should read something like > > The License of

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011107 16:08]: > Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > Python 1.6.1 is essentially the same as Python 1.6, with a few minor > >> > bug fixes, and with a different license that enables later versions > >> > to be GPL-compatible. > >>

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread Florian Weimer
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Python 1.6.1 is essentially the same as Python 1.6, with a few minor >> > bug fixes, and with a different license that enables later versions >> > to be GPL-compatible. >> >> The license claims to be GPL compatible, but according to the

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread dman
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 03:10:31PM +0100, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: | * Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011107 15:04]: | > Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > > It's probably better to check if you're unsure rather than speculate or | > > guess. From the 2.1.1 LICENCE file: | >

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011107 15:04]: > Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It's probably better to check if you're unsure rather than speculate or > > guess. From the 2.1.1 LICENCE file: > > > > Python 1.6.1 is essentially the same as Python 1.6, with a few mino

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-07 Thread Florian Weimer
Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's probably better to check if you're unsure rather than speculate or > guess. From the 2.1.1 LICENCE file: > > Python 1.6.1 is essentially the same as Python 1.6, with a few minor > bug fixes, and with a different license that enables late