Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-06 Thread Neil Schemenauer
dman wrote: > As I understand/recall the history, python 2.0 and 2.1 are not "GPL > compatible". However, 2.0.1 and 2.1.1 (note the micro version > increase) are "GPL Compatible". It's probably better to check if you're unsure rather than speculate or guess. From the 2.1.1 LICENCE file: Pyt

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-06 Thread dman
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:05:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: | Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit | | Please Cc: me, because I am not on the list. | | > python-ecasound | | I have been looking at python 2.1, and python2.1 debian/copyright file tells | me that it is "not G

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-06 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I have been looking at python 2.1, and python2.1 debian/copyright file tells > me that it is "not GPL compatible". > > Is it still so? No. Python 2.1 is derived from 1.6.1 and _is_ GPL compatible. According to some laywers Python 2.0 is not GPL. According to other laywer

Re: Python-2.1 becoming Debian's default Python version

2001-11-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit Please Cc: me, because I am not on the list. > python-ecasound I have been looking at python 2.1, and python2.1 debian/copyright file tells me that it is "not GPL compatible". Is it still so? regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECT