On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
> Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default
> Python interpreter, not more than one.
Given that dpkg allows only one package called "foo" to be installed
On 29-Oct-2001 Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
> packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
>
anyone is me, the maint. (-: Although any pythoners among you willing to get
dirty with perl are welcome to send patches.
> At
Hi,
I've prepared some fixes for all bugs in Iceme (I ITAed some
time ago). I did not upload a new version since I was waiting
for the Python transition.
I'll upload a new version soon.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
> "python" is a real package, no virtual one. I.e. at any given time,
> there is only one package "python" on a system (neither python1.5 nor
> python2.1 will provide "python").
Duh, okay. :)
Thanks - Ben.
* Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 15:46]:
>
> > > Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> > > Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
> >
> > This is a lintian bug. It's not bothering to notice that one's a less-than
> > and the other's a greater-than.
>
> Btw, isn't
> > Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> > Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
>
> This is a lintian bug. It's not bothering to notice that one's a less-than
> and the other's a greater-than.
Btw, isn't this Depends line problematic anyway? I could have python 1.5
a
Anthony Towns wrote:
Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default
Python interpreter, not more than one.
Greetings, Bastian
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Federico Di Gregorio writes:
> > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > > 3. As the policy mandates, I have made the packages depend on
> > >
> > >python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
> > >
> > >Lintian doesn't really like that.
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only suggestion is, if you are at all in doubt about supporting
> multiple versions of python, don't use the 2.1.1 "support only the
> default" packaging option, instead use the 2.1.3-1. "multiple
> versioned packages" option.
>
> Note that even if
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
> No, this is not equivalent!
Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
> The
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:40:33PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
> packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
Lintian is advisory only.
> Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> Depends: python
Hi.
Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
No, this is not equivalent! The Conflict means that I cannot install
happydoc and python2.2 simultaneously, and this is not desired.
I know t
Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
At the moment, lines like
Depends: python1.5
cause an error, E: python-script-but-no-python-dep
Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
Depends: python (>= 2
I updated python-happydoc to the proposed policy and uploaded it to
ftp-master.debian.org:/home/doko/www/python-uploads/ . Lintian marked
'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
--
Harry Henry Gebel
West Dover
14 matches
Mail list logo
