RE: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-26 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 18-Sep-2001 Neil Schemenauer wrote: > Please comment. > > Neil it is /usr/share/common-licenses, not licences. Annoying thing there being two spellings of some common words.

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-26 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > We could perhaps differenciate python modules and bindings. > > For example, libxml bindings for Python would be libxml-python. > Also, python-gtk would become libgtk-python, python-gnome would become > libgnome-python > and so on. > > However, xml tools for python would stay pytho

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-26 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
On Wed, 2001-09-26 at 11:37, Jérôme Marant wrote: > David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > 2.3. Module Package Names > > > - > > > > > > Python module packages should be named for the primary module > > >

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-26 Thread Jérôme Marant
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2.3. Module Package Names > > - > > > > Python module packages should be named for the primary module > > provided. The naming convention for module `foo' is `python-foo'