Jim Penny wrote:
> I just want to ask a couple of questions to make sure that I understand
> this in detail. Suppose python2.1 is installed as python and you
> also have python1.5 installed. You have
> script poo which is invoked via #!/usr/bin/python and
> script bah which is invoked via #!/us
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
>
I just want to ask a couple of questions to make sure that I understand
this in detail. Suppose python2.1 is installed as python and you
also have python1.5 installed. You have
script poo which is invoked via #!/usr/bin/python
Ricardo Javier Cardenes wrote:
> I think this:
>
> /usr/local/lib/python./site-packages
> /usr/local/lib/site-python
> /usr/lib/python./site-packages
>
> should be the order.
I see not problem with that. It shouldn't make any difference except in
the case you describe.
> And what happene
Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Looks fine to me. I'd prefer /usr/bin/python-X.Y, but that's
> cosmetics, not really important.
It has been pythonX.Y for many years. We should not change it.
Neil
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> 1.2. Module Path
>
>
> Python searches a number of directories for modules. The module
> search path for Debian has been ordered to include these locations at
> the beginning of the path in the fol
Looks fine to me. I'd prefer /usr/bin/python-X.Y, but that's
cosmetics, not really important.
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile)
[gpg key fingerprint =
6 matches
Mail list logo