Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Jim Penny wrote: > I just want to ask a couple of questions to make sure that I understand > this in detail. Suppose python2.1 is installed as python and you > also have python1.5 installed. You have > script poo which is invoked via #!/usr/bin/python and > script bah which is invoked via #!/us

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Jim Penny
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > I just want to ask a couple of questions to make sure that I understand this in detail. Suppose python2.1 is installed as python and you also have python1.5 installed. You have script poo which is invoked via #!/usr/bin/python

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Ricardo Javier Cardenes wrote: > I think this: > > /usr/local/lib/python./site-packages > /usr/local/lib/site-python > /usr/lib/python./site-packages > > should be the order. I see not problem with that. It shouldn't make any difference except in the case you describe. > And what happene

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Mikael Hedin wrote: > Looks fine to me. I'd prefer /usr/bin/python-X.Y, but that's > cosmetics, not really important. It has been pythonX.Y for many years. We should not change it. Neil

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > 1.2. Module Path > > > Python searches a number of directories for modules. The module > search path for Debian has been ordered to include these locations at > the beginning of the path in the fol

Re: Debian Python Policy [draft]

2001-09-18 Thread Mikael Hedin
Looks fine to me. I'd prefer /usr/bin/python-X.Y, but that's cosmetics, not really important. -- Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176 Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home) Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile) [gpg key fingerprint =