Experimental Python 2.1 packages, release plans

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Gregor Hoffleit writes: > I have uploaded experimental Python 2.1 packages. Grab them at > > http://people.debian.org/~flight/python2/ thanks! > Now the problems start if neither 2.0.1 nor 2.1.1 would be ready in time. If > it's obious early that the won't be ready in time, we could sta

Experimental Python 2.1 packages, release plans

2001-05-24 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
I have uploaded experimental Python 2.1 packages. Grab them at http://people.debian.org/~flight/python2/ The packages are completely untested. I had to re-implement the building of the shared library (just finished), the remainder of the packages is mostly unchanged. In a few hours, I will l

Python 2.0.1 release schedule ?

2001-05-24 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
Hi Moshe, I'm trying to lay out a schedule for the Debian Python packages in woody. My plan would also depend on the release date of Python 2.0.1. Thomas Wouters wrote: "Another couple of weeks at least, before a release candidate. It also depends on Moshe; if he actually releases 2.0.1 anytime so

Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

2001-05-24 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I talked to RMS, Eben Moglen and GvR. The bad news: According to RMS+Moglen, > > the license used in Python 2.1 still is not yet compatible with the GPL. The > > good news: The PSF d

Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

2001-05-24 Thread Florian Weimer
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Florian Weimer writes: > > This is probably correct, but it is completely irrelevant in our case. > > Some parts of Python 2.1 are still covered by the GPL-incompatible > > CNRI license, so Python 2.1 as a whole is not GPL compatible. > > which part

Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Florian Weimer writes: > This is probably correct, but it is completely irrelevant in our case. > Some parts of Python 2.1 are still covered by the GPL-incompatible > CNRI license, so Python 2.1 as a whole is not GPL compatible. which parts exactly?

Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

2001-05-24 Thread Florian Weimer
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I talked to RMS, Eben Moglen and GvR. The bad news: According to RMS+Moglen, > the license used in Python 2.1 still is not yet compatible with the GPL. The > good news: The PSF decided to drop the choice of law clause. A modified > license is in CVS, a