Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python2 (and fixes for the previous proposal)

2001-01-11 Thread Rob Tillotson
Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Only CPython uses .pycs. Stackless uses the same PYCs as the > corresponding version of CPython, JPython uses .class files. > Python.NET is MS vapour, so I have no idea what it uses. This isn't really restricted to .pycs -- the point is that a package cann

Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python2 (and fixes for the previous proposal)

2001-01-11 Thread Moshe Zadka
On 10 Jan 2001 10:07:16 -0600, Rob Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Does anyone know where the bytecode format is documented? I am > > interested in understanding how bytecode works and is designed.) > > As far as I know it's only documented in the source. The standard > module "dis.py

Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python2 (and fixes for the previous proposal)

2001-01-11 Thread Moshe Zadka
On 10 Jan 2001 09:16:51 -0600, Rob Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Python 1.5 and 2.0 --- there is also jpython, stackless, perhaps > even python.net, and it might eventually be desirable to have all of > these installed side-by-side with separate sets of library modules. Only CPython uses

Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python 2.0

2001-01-11 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:03:57 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From the Python news file: > - Python bytecode files (*.pyc and *.pyo) are not compatible between > releases. Note that this is a promise the Python development team makes : we break the .pyc almost every revision. In particular 2.1 (w