Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python 2.0

2001-01-09 Thread D-Man
I thought that's what you meant with the executable. I was imagining that the python executables would be in separate directories (or just different names) ie /usr/bin/python15 and /usr/bin/python20. Then have a symlink /usr/bin/python -> /usr/bin/python20. If you have a different solution th

Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python 2.0

2001-01-09 Thread J�r�me Marant
D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It sounds good to me. I think the admin should have the option of > setting the symlinks to default to 1.5 or 2.0. Sorry, I can't see what symlink you are dealing with ? -- Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://jerome.marant.free.fr

Re: Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python 2.0

2001-01-09 Thread D-Man
It sounds good to me. I think the admin should have the option of setting the symlinks to default to 1.5 or 2.0. -D On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:04:33PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: | [snip proposal for multiple version installation] | -- | Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Proposal: Reorganizing Python for Python 2.0

2001-01-09 Thread J�r�me Marant
Hi all, I'm posting my proposal as Gregor ask me to. Its purpose is to regorganise python in order to make multiple versions and modules at the same time. 1) Problem: - we want python 2 to enter debian ASAP - we do not want to duplicate packages for python 2 - the python vers