On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, [ISO-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> So, .py scripts can be used with any Python releases without any problem.
> (.py files can then be compiled at postinst time).
This is the best way to hadnle it.
Something to still consider is whether we want to deal with Python 1.5.2
and P
> BTW, what's the reason of making packages containing .py files? Is not
> it
> better to include only .pyo and .pyc files? And for those who really
> need
> sources there those source packages?
A good reason (mentioned in a previous thread) is that there are some
incompatibilities between byte
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:31:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > There is no need to include .pyc and .pyo in packages as python programs
> > can work without at first use. Moreover, this makes packages
> > bigger.
> BTW, what's the reason of m
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:31:10PM +0100, JИrТme Marant wrote:
> There is no need to include .pyc and .pyo in packages as python programs
> can work without at first use. Moreover, this makes packages
> bigger.
BTW, what's the reason of making packages containing .py files? Is not it
better
4 matches
Mail list logo
