/debian-kernel/2007/01/msg00042.html
I have indeed.
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:30:01AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 05:47:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:38:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
h.
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 09:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> > And Frans doesn't read private ? Well, to bad for him, you did manage
> > to read the sentence where i wrote "I ask the permission to take Frans
> > email public", right ? Since he is the only one
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:36:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Oh well, i guess it is ok for me to reply to a few points on this.
>
> No, Sven, it is not okay to say "I agreed instead to a self-imposed
>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:09:12AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> So, basically my question remains: why does it have to be so incredibly
> difficult to allow new members into these teams?
As opposed to joining the d-i team for example ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
20 based monolithic d-i, which i can
make available to you, no idea what processor is on your board though.
I uploaded it to :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i-2.6.20-amd64_i386.iso
(well, currently uploading, wait a couple of minutes before grabbing it).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To
ng on fixing my
> mistakes, which made me loose my temper and yell. For the remains of the
> 4 day meeting I practiced 3/.
He, neat, you must have a nice time machine, since i was in erkelenz only from
friday night to sunday end-of-afternoon. Maybe you could lend it to us, so we
could go and re
Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:20:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:52:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > Decision
> > >
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
>
> I'm very unsure whether this was a reasonable move but I will at least
> remove quotings from private. I
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:10:13PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, after Andrew Suffield, after Jonathan/Ted Walter, it is my turn,
> > because i
>
> Before everybody starts to believe this, Andrew Suffield has not been expulsed
> either.
rmed
> anymore by this kind of discussion and email exchanges. There were
> already a few hundred mails too many written on this subject.
Except myself, who am left bloody on the roadside to die, right ?
> Have a good day, and I hope to see you again in a year.
How can you expect me to have a good day with this ? You are really naive
about judging human behaviour, are you not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:55:24PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Joey, if i came back in a year, at the minor difference between me and
> > others,
> > it would be "he is backsliding" again, and another round of this mess.
>
> This en
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Well, you where not opposed to the likes of Frans, Manoj and Anthony, ...
>
> I think I tend to express my disagreement in different amplitude but even
> more
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
Why should i ? I have been expelled from debian, and can't
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sv
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sv
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:42:42AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PRO
from debian whoever it was who has abused
his debian account in such a way.
Joerg, Elmo, whoever else is in this charge, this is a clear violation of the
policy, and as thus, you should immediately take action.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:48PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> > Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> > >> I wanted that the expulsion be judged on his own, and not because i had
> > >> behaved or n
porn :-)
>
> Those who believe it is about something else:
> believe what you want to believe
There is Geert, coming out as expected.
Fellow DD, would you also suspend Geert now, he has been indulging in the
exact same behaviour which is reproached to me, so two weights two measures
ads, i was well behaving during january/february, and
would have been ok, but before the ban even ended, they asked for my
expulsion.
what do you expect from me ? what ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:03:39AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On 3/29/07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:52AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >> Sven,
> >>
> >> I don't think anything you could say will reverse t
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > This is very interesting, so you mean, it is impossible to have one
> > > > thread on
> > > > which one is very passionate, and post a lot, and then all the other
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > I would have gladly accepted any decision, provided it was a fair one, but
> > this one-sidedness is what caused all of this.
> &
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:24:12PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 08:13:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > >
urrent
solution is only there to punish me, but doesn't solve the problem that you
address.
As such, i can only see it as an act of vengeance of a few who wanted to get
ride of me, or as a stupid decision which fails to achieve its goal, and hurt
me by doing so.
Friendly,
Sven Luth
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:52:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> As you all know there's been an expulsion process (following the
> procedure outlined in [1]) running, with Sven Luther as the
> nominee. We've finally reached a decision. *Please* read t
e procedure was handled.
Hurt,
Sven Luther
- Forwarded message from Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:45:37 +0300
From: Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: This is g
m
the team.
This is evidence, beyond my own case, how Frans Pop is nuisible to debian, and
should be suspended to give him time to reflect upon his errors, just as i
have been suspended.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, please read the following, and this may give you more of an
> > insight about the situation.
>
> Please stop this *now*
Why ? Every attempt at playing nice has been meet with more punishment.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:23:01PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:20:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi, please read the following, and this may give you more of an insight
> > about
> > the situation.
> >
> Sven,
>
> E
hich was dubious and
hurting.
When will Debian realise that there should be a way to solve social problems,
and actually try to solve it, instead of trying to censor or silence the most
annoying party ? This is a real question, and once Debian has an answer for
that, it will solve my problem, but also
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:29:08PM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > When will Debian realise that there should be a way to solve social
> > problems,
> > and actually try to solve it, instead of t
january, february, and see that on february 21 some folk decided to want to
expulse me again.
Sorry, but playing nice doesn't work in debian, because the vast majority
doesn't really care, or doesn't care enough to take action when iniquity
happens.
So, given that, what do you suggest to me ?
Hurt,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nue to focus on quality and security
> to keep this wonderful volunteer-run GNU/Linux distribution suitable for
> business use.
Releases are being delayed, because the developers loose to much time fighting
between themselves :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
factor enters the picture, and with it the power
actually hold by those who are able to make other believe they represent
debian, and you have the receipe for disaster.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:56:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:32:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You mean like the when the problems i now have are a direct result of me
>
> THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOU PLEASE. PLEASE LEAVE.
Then please commen
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:56:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > > THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT YOU PLEASE. PLEASE LEAVE.
> >
> > Then please commen
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:17:01PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > >Please, Sven. There is already one thread about you in -vote where
> > > you are already copiously posting and that people are acutely following.
&
t;For now I only want to disable it."
in the message you quote.
This seems in complete opposition to what you claim he did say.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:42:35PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:48:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > been re
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:26:08PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:28:37PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > > > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > > > b
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:52:13PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > If it would be done to anyone but me, you would cry in outrage, then why
> > > > not do so now ? Because there are too many hidden powers involved ?
> > >
> > >
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> are you part of an organisation called GNAA?
It is not nice to joke about your fellows hurt.
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To
next way to try
to silence me could very well involve physical hurt.
Let's again create a Debian to be proud of ...
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, in the ever continuing witch hunt against me, i just noticed,
> > while i was working on a patch fix for the debian kernel, that i have
> > been re
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
> > alioth team ?
> > 17:57:44 < waldi> nope
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:23:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070527 20:56]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
&g
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:38:24AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > 17:55:11 < svenl> waldi: do you know who removed me from the kernel
> > > > alioth team ?
> > > >
uch
> > or something? He'll probably speak up and explain things.
>
> I already said that I can't remember. I know there was something about
> dilinger and wli but not more.
Fine, so can you reactivate my access ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
e, and in a shady and mysterious
way.
It is not acceptable that debian deals in mafioso politics, and the
DAMs, by knowingly hiding most of the evidence, have actively
participated in it.
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
> >
> > It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
> > decision, which has achi
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 13:23]:
> > [...]
>
> Sven, this whole thread is about that your commit access to the kernel
This whole thread is about me being stopped from doing meaningful debian
technic
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:04:49PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
> > asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
>
tic
campaign to hurt me, i would have gone away running, and not sacrificed
so much of my time and work to debian.
And you ask me to be silent ?
Saddened,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:14:42AM -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> >
> >>Sven Luther wrote:
> >>
> >>>>After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 06:00:36PM]:
>
> > > You're not bringing up anything new.
> >
> > And i will repeat it as long as people try to ignore me, and until
> > Debian s
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:31:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> >> Sven, come on. This is not the right time and not the right place to
> >
> > When is the right time
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Sven Luther [Mon, May 28 2007, 08:23:52PM]:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > > cook this story _again_. You may be right, or not, it is just off-topic
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > then so be it, debian is better off without such persons whose behaviour
> > will only hurt the project again one way or another, and should not be
> > encouraged.
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:00:31AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > > > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > > > publicly ad
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:30:31AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:31:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >> You do not need to waste any more words on explain
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:53:07AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is the exact example of why things went bad in erkelenz, because
> > you are unable to hear what others have to say, and want to impose your
> > own opi
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:05:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am now making this request to you as DPL, that you investigate who was
> > behind this action, and find out why it was done, and that it be
> > publicly addres
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>> then so be it, d
s thread and go back to
> work.
No, we cannot, because the problem is not solved, because the DAMs
decision was a stupid and unfair one, not even speaking of its
irregularity and lack of transparence.
So, read : Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and reply
to its substance.
Saddened,
Sven
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:23:27PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> Debian is better off without you. Your behaviour has bee
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait deborder le vase', the
> > bigger problem remains as a raw wound, for me, and for debian as a
>
> The - what you call - bigger pr
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:07:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 13:58]:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait de
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:27:07AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Just leave Debian, like that, and who will give me back all those years
> > and uncountable hours i have sacrificed to debian ? Or the actual money
> > and time and eq
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, but this was only the 'goute qui a fait deborder le vase', the
>
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 13:57]:
> > So, what is the solution, i ask you, do you see some way out of this ? I
> > am all ears, ...
>
> i proposed a solution to you that would let you work o
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > >But you are not asking for justice, you are asking for revenge and
> > > retalation. And
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:35:35PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > May i ask you why there is no other solution ? What is it that makes it
> > a total heresy to even propose we try to solve it fairly and honourably ?
>
> Because what you would accept
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:35:01PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Is this so much to ask ? I ask this not of you, but of Debian, of you
> > Joey, of all other readers.
>
> Yes.
How sad, ...
but it isd because of this, that the problem is still present a
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it
> > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to
>
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:13:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:14:20PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it
> > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to
> > hurry to search expulsion supporter
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:41:44PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:32 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > > Sven, let me ask you something. Do you really feel you stood a single
> > > chance to be elected as DPL?
> >
> > Nope
>
&g
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:35AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:20PM +0200]:
> > > without a reason. This is justice: the harm was undone, you have aquired
> > > an additional level of protection, and no measures were taken against
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:35:21AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:22PM +0200]:
> > > Funny thing about volunteers.. They tend to give their time willingly
> > > without getting things in return. That's kind of the point. If
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:12:19PM +0200]:
> > > > Then what will change it ?
> > >
> > > Just leave Debian.
> >
> > Why should i ? Just because debian is unable tyo reco
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:05:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:58 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Ok, so you have really no idea and are just trolling ?
>
> Yes, definitely. I think Debian should remain a place of shadowy
> dealings and mafioso p
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 17:44 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Can you tell me a single other reason which justified that my expulsion
> > was requested on february 7 or so ?
>
> For example, that could be
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:25:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 18:10:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > So, maybe i should publish the irc logs of the french cabal to help your
> > memory, right ?
> >
> TINFC.
Oh fun, MadCoder is threa
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:32:00PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:07:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > Err, a handful is "so many people". I guess this is the cause of all my
> > problem, we don't speak the same language.
&
ound half of this thread, instead of
saying, ok, we will investigate the issue, and solve this so everyone is
happy.
Sad, isn't it ?
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:50:51PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> On 11034 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > As an example of why this is a mess :
> > 14:27:44 < Ganneff> svenl: would you *ever* consider something as
> > "valid way out" thats no
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:19:14PM +0100, Stephen Birch wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, it is only a handful of people who really have a problem with me. I
> > guess if you go down to it there is only a single person who really has
> > a problem, and a few others who also
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:45:51PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > Sven,
> > >
> > > You may or may not have been mistreated but the volume of your
> > > argument
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070529 18:17]:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:29:35AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Sven Luther dijo [Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:20PM +0200]:
> > > > > without a
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Yes, it is only a handful of people who really have a problem with me. I
> >guess if you go down to it there is only a single person who really has
> >a pr
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:49:23AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 09:59, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > You might want to consider developing a web page with careful
> > > analysis of evidence
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:05:59PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11034 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >> > 14:27:44 < Ganneff> svenl: would you *ever* consider something as
> >> > "valid way out" thats not 100% what you want, ie "you
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:07:31PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > > >
201 - 300 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
