Re: Making Debian work: a question of trust indeed

2007-11-20 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
e with my opinion that the tone of the email is perhaps a little too aggressive, please just disregard this email. I have no intention of lighting the fire myself. Hopefully I'm just being over-cautious. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-26 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
ing this 'abs_fdisk', which AFAICT is just a "read-only non-root" fdisk, you could just create a setuid wrapper to the normal fdisk and use it from linhdd? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-27 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
of security any other setuid binary in the system has. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections

2008-02-25 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
ion of it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership

2008-10-24 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
also multi-signed) .commands file as a veto. And I second the thought that counting just votes as keep-alive is perhaps too strict. Aside from that, I agree with the idea. Cheers [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/10/msg00154.html -- Leo "costela" Antunes [inse

Re: Debian Membership

2009-03-14 Thread Leo 'costela7; Antunes
ls make any bug shallow" effect, which should apply - at least tangentially - to security as well... Just my 0,2€. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Debian Membership

2009-03-14 Thread Leo 'costela7; Antunes
[still not subscribed to -newmaint, just keeping the cross-post] Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 14 March 2009, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: >> IMHO that's a false notion of "security through laziness" :). > > Black hats are lazy too. They go after easy ta

Re: On cadence and collaboration

2009-08-05 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
ease the management overhead and still keep the theoretical security gains. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: On cadence and collaboration

2009-08-06 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
#x27;s nothing pointless in countering it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Summary of the debian-devel BoF at Debconf9

2009-08-18 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
of emails before the content can affect us in ways we don't even notice. Of course this could all be in vain and all it achieves could be turning petty insistence on a point into petty wiki redacting wars, but might be interesting to try. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes

Re: Summary of the debian-devel BoF at Debconf9

2009-08-18 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
o to speak - the thread and therefore could be taken somewhere else, in order to keep the central thread concise. Please note I'm not showing my endorsement for this idea, just clarifying what my interpretation of it was. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort her

Re: Summary of the debian-devel BoF at Debconf9

2009-08-18 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
ny useful solution... I believe I'm not the only one who feels an email saying "let's calm down and get back to the point" to be pretty much useless, specially after hitting the point of ad-hominem attacks or accusations thereof. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antun

Re: Löschung meiner Daten

2009-09-22 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
s? Sarcasm might not be the best way to communicate with someone that may not understand the limitations inherent to our list system or our policy towards it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.d

Re: What to do about negligent maintainers?

2010-01-07 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
ns anytime someone complains about someone else's work, regardless of the complaint's merits. Asking for TC intervention is also an option, but it's IMHO a bit extreme. Though I still find it better than the other proposed alternatives (DAM intervention, GR, whatever). Cheers -

Re: security.debian.org down?

2004-02-03 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
On Ter, 2004-02-03 at 14:00, John Goerzen wrote: > seem easy enough to at least log on to the machine that hosts *the* > www.debian.org and vi a couple of files. I don't think it's THAT easy, but I do agree that we could exploit (oh geez, did I say that word?!) the possibility of fortifying our ba

Re:

2004-02-16 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
[replying in pt_BR only] Bom dia Esta lista não é destinada a este tipo de discussão, ela é uma lista para discussões específicas do projeto Debian e sua língua oficial é o inglês. Caso tenha dúvidas sobre a Debian e esteja procurando auxílio, por favor vá ao canal de IRC #debian-br ou envie ema

Re: debian com kernel bsd

2004-07-15 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
[answer in pt_BR only] Hadiel, Primeiramente, essa lista de discussão é somente em inglês. Para questões em português, use a lista debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Quanto à sua pergunta, já existem versões da Debian funcionando com kerneis BSD, mas eu - pessoalmente - nunca usei nenhuma d

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

2004-08-06 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
On Sex, 2004-08-06 at 09:09, MJ Ray wrote: > To me, the most obvious fix is to replace debian-women with something > like debian-equality or debian-welcome, to try to get people active > against discrimination rather than actively promoting blatent sexism. I'm don't know how much the Debian gir

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

2004-08-06 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
On Sex, 2004-08-06 at 16:09, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > You just don't care about the problem that debian-women is trying to > deal. I think you're being over defensive. If I understood Jaldhar H. Vyas right, I agree with him. What I understand is: Debian (as a Project, in it's Social Contract or Polic