> I see other people doing this too. I like it.
>
> The problem of course is that the official term is not "member" so
> this is unclear and arguably wrong in some sense. It should be. I
> would second a GR to change it.
While I would agree with the phrase "DDs are full Debian members",
I would
> But yes, it's entirely possible that I'm being too cautious.
I'd say, being cautious in this case is very warranted.
One of the things, that are good about Debian is, that it's _not_ cooperate.
"You will not work for free for a company. Debian is not a company."
Throwing in money has a high r
> For example, an Application Manager in the NM process will tend to err
> for asking a question more, that DAM will have to read.
>
> I haven't yet seen easy ways of introducing a feedback mechanism to
> counter this: saying "you didn't need to do this" feels to me like
> arbitrarily undervaluing
Hi,
> This does raise the wider question: we're about to freeze for Bookworm.
> Removing leaf packages and packages with a small user count might be
> profitable
> at this point. Fortune-mod has some bugs at the moment preventing testing
> transition and has had several NMUs prior to the latest u
Hi,
> It would be helpful if Debian would create (and keep up-to-date) a web
> page of acronymns and abbreviations used by Debian literati. Or is there
> already such a one, but not listed on the site map?
There is one in the wiki - https://wiki.debian.org/Glossary
signature.asc
Description:
5 matches
Mail list logo
