On Tue, Jul 02 2019, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/07/02 11:26, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I do feel significantly less welcome in Debian since diversity /
>> antiharassment / policitcal correctnes / CoC came around the corner.
>
> How so regarding diversity/antiharassment/CoC? They do nothing to
> t
Hi,
I mean this post as a challenge, but not as blame. I know many teams do
hard work that can be thankless, and my intent is not to blame them, but
to challenge us as a project to question our processes and attitudes.
Here's what I mean:
On October 12, I uploaded glktermw, a new package. On O
On Tue, Dec 24 2019, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Le mardi 24 décembre 2019 à 09:51:04-0600, John Goerzen a écrit:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I mean this post as a challenge, but not as blame. I know many teams do
>> hard work that can be thankless, and my intent is not to blam
On Tue, Dec 24 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 24, 2019 10:51:04 AM EST John Goerzen wrote:
> ...
>> pygopherd was removed from testing. That makes sense. But also from
>> sid, hours after I replied to the bug about this explaining that I was
>> ac
On Wed, Dec 25 2019, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/12/24 20:08, John Goerzen wrote:
>
>> But at the same time, I feel that the project as a whole isn't really
>> taking this problem very seriously.
>
> That is true, probably mostly because many people don't
On Wed, Dec 25 2019, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 11:11:43AM -0500, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
>>
>> More generally, New is being processed as fast as it can given available
>> volunteer time. Any delays are not reflective of a lack of value placed on
>> people's contributi
On Mon, Dec 30 2019, Steven Robbins wrote:
> In another thread, Russ Allbery makes a salient observation [1]:
>
> Requiring ftpmasters to [review debian/copyright before accepting an
> upload] is a choice that Debian has made. Maybe it's the right choice,
> but other choices exis
On 08/16/2010 08:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
In particular, developing a code of conduct/community guideline that
encourages use of a facilitator to resolve conflicts, with a goal to
avoid needing to escalate to anything beyond that. One of the issues
that came up at DebConf, and is discussed in
On 11/04/2010 07:06 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Agreed. Others have expressed the position that reading occasional
non-Debian posts in the Planet Debian flow helps to relate to other
members as people with lives outside Debian; that seems something of
value that we should be careful not to sacrifice c
On 11/11/2010 06:01 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Furthermore there are reports of webbugs in some feeds syndicated on
planet, or things that systematically leak browsing behaviour to third
parties by including images directly from these sides.
I don't know much about this one, so no posi
Dear folks,
I wise man once told me, years ago, that he had unsubscribed from
debian-devel because of all the noise. I had thought that rather odd at
the time, but have come to appreciate it since.
Like many, I have my opinion in the init system (my choice: sysvinit -
it ain't broke, and I alrea
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:20:05AM -0900, Bill Dammeyer wrote:
> Before I decided to go with debian/linux, I read "Why Debian" on your site.
> It is a shame that
> you don't have a "Why Not Debian, or Linux, for that matter" article also.
> In the four months
> I have been trying to use Debian, I
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:38:52PM +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-14 16:41]:
> > (OT) Is information about Debian's financial status available
> > publically? Where would I look to be able to form my own opinion as
> > to wh
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:42:29AM -0700, Patrick Mccall wrote:
> I downloaded the first debian cd to install the os and
> try it out. After going through the install process
> and rebooting with no errors I get a dos-like system..
> Is this all debain is?? I didnt even get a gui!!!.
No, it's not.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:22:07AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I want to remind you all, that previous to the two GRs which clarified the
> meaning of what we must consider free, we had a widely disputed GR on the fate
> of our non-free section, and we all voted to keep it, especially because there
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:57:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:35:02AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > That's not correct. The project simply voted not to removed it at that
> > time, by defeating the GR. There was no affirmative vote to keep
>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:35:31PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:23:41AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't see what that has to do with the simple fact of what the vote
> > was about and how it turned out.
>
> So, you think that the vote
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 11:36:34PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Why? I have very little feeling for what SPI does, as long as
> they do not lose Debian money for the third time. Considering all
> SPI has to do is take in money designated for Debian, and hold it in
> a bank (somethi
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:04:47AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > Yes, Debian does have a role to play when SPI is deciding whether to
> > (for example) support voting software. The actual decision will of
> > course be taken by SPI via SPI's channels, but Debian is entitled to
> > fully pa
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:52:07AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Debian developers are given automatic status as contributing members in
> SPI, and I know two board members have explicitly encouraged people
> to be involved in SPI recently:
>
> http://wiki.gag.com/cgi-bin/blosxom/2006/07/20#2
an NMU. After all, it's one less
thing I have to do to it, right?
I do get extremely irritated when someone NMUs my package and breaks
it and disappears. But that's only happened a couple of times to me.
--
John Goerzen
Author, Foundations of Python Network Programming
http://www.a
Hello,
The Debian stable distribution has been a thorn in our side for a long
time. We tend to go a long time between releases, which means that
stable grows less and less useful as time goes on. We also have a
strict policy on what is allowed into stable.
This policy has many merits, especiall
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:43:53AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
> > Examples of things that should happen in stable, but haven't been
> > happening reliably:
> >
> > * Kernel updates with more broad hardware support
>
> This requires
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 09:03:12PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:52:29 +0200,
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:43:53AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > It would be good, though, especially in order to have some support for
> > > hardware that has entered
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:48:03PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> and used Debian packaging, here's what was required only to get the
> binary package installed:
>
> http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/main module-init-tools 3.2.2-2bpo1
> [79.3kB]
> http://www.backports.org sarge-backports/m
This is an edited copy of something I posted to -private yesterday. I
think it is relevant to all the discussions here, and have a few things
to add.
Back in the old FidoNet days, the policy for discussion was something
along the lines of:
Don't be excessively annoying, and don't be easily ann
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:20:24PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text :
> > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI
>
> Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:54:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting
> > everyone's time.
> >
> > Sven, please just live and let live.
>
> John, what do you think this is all about ? I would be very very happy to
> follow this advic
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Piotr Dziubinski wrote:
> I'm very irritated and disappointed with your policy! Why?
>
> I've used various Linux distributions for 8 years. I've been using Debian
> for the last 6 months, but today I changed my mind!
>
> After updating Firefox in Debian I
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
>
> Why shou
Hi folks,
I am trying to find out exactly when I joined Debian.
This is not as easy as it might seem.
There seem to be three possible dates:
1) The date of my first upload
2) The date my account was created on master
3) The date my key was added to the keyring
I'm pretty sure that this all w
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:44:08PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to find out exactly when I joined Debian.
> [...]
> > 1) The date of my first upload
>
> Oldest signature block claiming you to be a DD s
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:11:37PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> But 2 Jan 1996 was a Tuesday and
> http://archive.debian.org/dists/Debian-1.3.1/main/source/net/modemu_0.0.1-1.dsc
> seems to be signed with 2048 bit RSA key E9B2C0BD, created: 1997-01-01.
>
> That would explain why modemu at sunsite (now i
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:35:25AM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote:
> I would define it like this:
>
> 1. Started using - the moment one installed his/her first Debian system.
> 2. Joined community - first post to the mailing list; most probably
>asking for advice or providing advice to somebody
On Monday 06 August 2007 1:28:20 pm Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But then again: Ian Murdock is there because he is the Debian founder,
> > right? I do not know if nowadays he is in any actual way _related to_
> > Debian. Yes, not all Planet members are DDs (
On Fri December 14 2007 8:00:10 am Martin Schulze wrote:
> The "official" way for this would be to use the bsmtp service on gluck.
> Having a private UUCP installation on master is... interesting.
Where can we find documentation on this bsmtp service?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu January 31 2008 9:35:08 am Richard Hecker wrote:
> This looks like confirmation that vorlon was right to
> mistrust HennaX as a female.
But surely that is not a requirement to be in that channel, right? I mean,
if vorlon and Clint were there
I am not saying I mistrust vorlon or anyo
On Mon February 25 2008 2:29:27 pm Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On ma, 2008-02-25 at 10:31 -0500, David Moreno wrote:
> > > IMHO, the DPL position should have less showcase and more time to get
> > > some real work done during time (
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:24:18PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > vote :-)
>
> Probably :)
> If I were a DD (-- and I'm NM), I'd think a bit more before proposing a GR to
> *completely* remove non-free. Non-free is, for some users, necessary (I'd
> happily --purge flashplugin-nonfree, but I can't
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:12:08PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Please don't take this as a provoking mail, I'm in NM, and God knows how many
> times I've read the Social Contract (and DFSG, and DMUP, and $policy) before
> applying :)...
> Did I miss something?
No. I agree with you, and actually
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I could go over the posts on debian-project and debian-devel with a
> > fine toothed comb and post a list of all the messages there which
> > evince the confusion, including several from users who were very
> > worried about "removing non-free from Debia
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wish to propose an ammendment to the proposed resolution as follows.
This is not really an amendment.
> 1) the Debian project continues to acknowledge the utility of providing
> non-free software for it users.
What do we need a GR for this?
Very well put. I agree 100%.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having Lyx not have an explicit dependency on xforms (apt-get install lyx
> succeeds, but it doesn't work, why not?), or having that dependency not be
> meetable within Debian (should it depend on libxforms? or xformslib? or
Please. The dependency is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> ** On Jun 10, John Goerzen scribbled:
> > How about leaving the choice to the people, not bugging the users, and
> > not crippling the distribution? That's what I've proposed.
> What?? You left NO choice to the users
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> > It means that if you are running unstable, you should know how to deal
> > with instability. Don't run unstable otherwise.
> But I will. I just doubt anyone with less motivation than most of us here
> have to use Debian, will make the effort to pac
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:05:36AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > But this is wrong too. People can still run non-free software with
> > Debian if they like; as amended, the social contract would still
> > explicitl
Bolan Meek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest that the non-free packages be replaced by installer
> assistants,
I would support such a solution as a compromise, and in fact, have
already indicated such. As long as Debian does not distribute the
non-free code itself.
-- John
--
To UNSU
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> That would be acceptable, but I see just two points. First is a technical
> one:
>
> - if a package is fetched from a site outside of the Debian control, the
>Debian project cannot guarantee the quality of service, because it cannot
>guarant
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 1) the Debian project continues to acknowledge the utility of providing
> > > non-free software for it users.
> >
> > What do we need a GR for this? What makes you think that there is
> > utility in us actually providing it?
>
> What m
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Does Debian include non-free software?"
> "Any of the Debian packages itself doesn't include non-free, No."
> "Then users can't use the packages for non-free softwares ?"
> "Some un-official packages in contrib can install non-free softwares
> v
By your argument, again, we ought to just allow everything in. This
is clearly not what Debian is about. We are about Free Software here,
folks. Allowing non-free does not increase net utility; it decreases
it. The greatest increase in net utility will come by promoting Free
Software rather th
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So why do we need to manage it and distribute it from our servers?
> Because that's the best way to maintain quality control. Add-on packages
> from the Debian project must meet the Debian project's policy, which
Actually, some of these areas are dump
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> I never questioned anybody's morality. I only questioned morality of the
> situation where we're taking away something from someone (and do it by
> force) without giving them anything else instead. I think it is immoral
> (note: I don't say that *some
Ryan White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I too would be forced to use another dist if the non-free software was no
> longer maintained by debian. I like many other people have put a lot of
Why? Why could you not just install it yourself or update your
sources.list? After all, this is no worse
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John has said that non-free has ceased to be useful based on the fact that
> he doesn't actually make use of it, and many others agreed with this
> assesement. So here is a slightly different perspective.
Jason, you are so badly distorting my positi
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 03:30:04PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > What do we need this in a GR for?
>
> To reaffirm the principles you are working to erode.
Your principles are the support and spreading of non-free software?
Ju
hat's
Why? Why does it not make sense to remove the non-free software from
the Debian Project?
> the whole point - the GR is a purely political move (and not a very clean,
> moral and right one...)
>
> regards,
> marek
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13-Jun-00, 01:30 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 03:30:04PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> ** On Jun 13, John Goerzen scribbled:
>
> [snip]
> > > facts I outlined are true, then the GR doesn't make sense at all! ANd that's
> >
> > Why? Why does it not make sense to remove the non-free software fro
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 01:27:40AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > By your argument, again, we ought to just allow everything in. This
>
> You won't win an argument by inventing arguments you wish your opponent had
> s
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > We could manage non-free separately but quality control would suffer.
> >
> > People keep claiming this but nobody has yet shown why.
>
> Namespace conflicts for one.
I see no reason why this has to be a problem. We do not have
namespace confli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> > > > We could manage non-free separately but quality control would suffer.
> > >
> > > People keep claiming this but nobody has yet shown why.
> >
> > Namespace conflicts for one.
> - version conflicts
What do you mean?
> - compliance with the
Carsten Leonhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You presume to infer far too much in many ways.
> >
> > First, you infer that net utility declines when non-free is removed.
> > I am unconvinced.
>
> Why exactly did you package non-free/idled? Even though you seem to be
> unconvinced that it e
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 5. Is it right to deprive people the ability and right to
> > fix or modify software that Debian distributes?
>
> The majority of software in non-free does not, in fact, limit these
> rights. It either limits the right to distribute such chang
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13-Jun-00, 01:57 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...Nor did I say that it is not useful simply because I did not use
> > it. Nor, I think, did anyone else support my position on those
> >
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:33:17PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > My proposal does not throw out the social contract. It strengthens
> > it. I fail to see how you can call supporting and spreading non-free
> > software
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > To reaffirm the principles you are working to erode.
> >
> > Your principles are the support and spreading of non-free software?
>
> Not at all. I refer to the principles stated in the Debian
> Social Contract:
>
> 5. Programs That Don't Mee
gt; --
> G. Branden Robinson |
> Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |will @goH7OjBd7*dnfk= http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
- --
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complet
Because you typed:
debian-projects
instead of
debian-project
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:57:42PM -0800, Mr. Jan Hearthstone wrote:
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: 27 Jan 2005 22:53:18 -
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: failure notice
> >
> >
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 07:51:40PM +0200, Sebastian Feltel wrote:
> Martin Schulze schrieb am 27.03.2005 19:35:
> >Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks. I'll try.
The amd64 project may appreciate this --
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ,
I don't really know myself what the procedures are, but I'm CCing the
trademark list on this for their feedback.
-- John
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:11:30PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> SPI board members,
>
> The debian project leader recently reported problems with the
> debiangnulinux.com and .n
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:22:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:44:33PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> > I didn't post that status nor are we actively monitoring it. Someone from
> > Alpha needs to get proactive and run the ball if they care about that
> > machine.
>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:44:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [I am not subscribed to the spi-trademark list.]
Nor am I.
[ much snippage ]
> I'm CCing John Goerzen, the SPI President -- John, if you think it would be
> a good idea, please ask David to add an SPI Trademark Co
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 1) Finding problems, reporting bugs, submitting patches
> >
> > 2) Answering questions on the mailing lists from developers that need
> > help solving an a
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:35:31AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I have not received any suggestions about this, the debian-admins
> have not answered my (or Joy's) mails and the CNAME is still wrong.
> My original request is dated April 12.
You know, that particular situation is really, really po
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:16:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I have not received any suggestions about this, the debian-admins
> >have not answered my (or Joy's) mails and the CNAME is still wrong.
> >My original request is dated April 12.
>
> Update: no updates.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:40:19PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I disagree. These days, any moron and their father can set up a mail
> server with proper queuing. That does not mean they can protect it
> against relaying. I se *no* (read that again: NO) reason why anyone
> should run a mail spoo
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see no problem with SPI supporting all kinds of free software and
> Debian FreeBSD won't become propitary it can't nobody can tell us
> (Debian) to stop developing it as a piece of free software.
The fact that SPI will not make it proprietary does not
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 10:06:18PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Please, people, if you have not thought through the ramifications of
> > what you are trying to do, take a step back and look at the big
> > picture first. Why not try to help the fr
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> about a year ago, seems to be bolstered by its supporters with two
> mutually exclusive arguments:
>
> 1. It will have minimal effects since people will still be able to use
> non-free software.
>
> 2. It will have far-reaching effects since Debian (t
the proposal require that they continue to be used. It is up
to be decided by the appropriate people what to do.
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org
Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc.www.progenylinux.com
#include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I disagree. It will have effect on the CD distribution. It will
> > have an effect on the http/ftp/rsync distribution.
>
> Gah, okay, this is a stupid reply but I felt the mistake warrented
> it. I intended to say 'It will NOT have effect
or
> confidentiality.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any
> attachments without retaining a copy.
>
> ******
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org
t' to `gnucash'.
>
> > --
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After looking at the logs of the failed builds at [2] it seems that
> there's a build problem related with guppi.
Yes. I believe this is a bug in guppi (see #122297, #123222).
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:01:21PM -0500, Rob Levin wrote:
> It's not all Debian, by any means. There are quite a few projects on OPN,
> now freenode. I think the Debian project benefits from the cross-
There are also projects that you have booted off because you didn't like
their discussion.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Rob Levin wrote:
> There are two issues. The first issue whether it's appropriate for a
> non-profit to ask for modest funds to run its projects. We've worked to
> ensure that our fundraising has minimum impact on the network, and we've
This "minimum im
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 07:07:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Insert standard rant about abuse of the word "spam". Observe that with
> a single command at the start of every connection (I'm working on ways
> to make it a one-shot command that persists for all connections by the
> same user, b
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 05:06:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> A wild _technical_ card. I refuse to support a move that we don't have
> technical confidence in; despite the splits, OpenProjects has not been
> a disappointment on that side. It also is even less likely to vanish.
I'm not so
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:26:16PM -0400, Vaidhy Mayilrangam wrote:
> Usually, I stay away from all discussions of this sort.. but this one
> seems to be too political for Debian's own good.
What makes it "political" any more than any other Debian discussion?
> For what I understand, most attac
t the site, it's on my DSL and it gets pretty booked
up. Try again when you get a chance. Thanks.
(http://somegeek.org/why.html)
--
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:50:53PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Richard van den Berg wrote:
> > Is it possible to set up a mirror somewhere for the time being?
>
> There are a number of unofficial mirrors available. If you need one in .nl
> try this one:
>
> deb http://ftp.debian.n
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:08:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Never mind unofficial:
> > http://www.debian.org/mirror/list-non-US
> ^^
> We don't have official security mirrors. Probably should rethink that.
Err, oops, I read that too fast, thought he w
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:45:16AM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > A single CD (CD #1) is sufficient to install a system including X.
>
> And if someone has internet access while installing, they can do the
> debian mirror system a favour, and only gr
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:06:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Not only did you ignore my Mail-Followup-To header, to which I drew your
> attention in the very first line of my reply, but you mailed me a
> private copy of your message.
I always use "g" to respond to mailing list posts in mut
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:53:24AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> I was responding to your post at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200308/msg03193.html,
> which among other things appeared to assert that everything in Debian is
> software, and that I am
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:50:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'm not going to respond to this message except to point you to this:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200112/msg00250.html
>
> PLEASE NOTE: I no longer stand by my assertions in points 2) and 3) of
> th
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:47:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200112/msg00027.html
> > > "The Social Contract does not say: Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software
> > > and Some Other Things That Aren't Software But Which Are Also Free
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> This change was quite recent (since 14 August 2003), if we are to accept
> as true the assertion in the first comment on the article at:
I find myself wondering what relevance this has to any discussion on any
list it was posted o
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
