Hi, CJ:
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 21:49:31 CJ Fearnley wrote:
[...]
> Here are some concrete ideas that might positively improve our
> coordination with upstreams:
[...]
> - Add a reportbug --kudos-upstream facilitity to send kudos upstream
>* This will require a standard metadata a fiel
Hi Tshepang:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 19:02:39 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 18:13, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
[...]
>
> You ask a question, and someone answers. If you find the answer
> useful, you vote it as correct, and the answerer gets points for that.
> You also get
Hi, Stefano:
On Friday 08 October 2010 10:22:24 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:03:42PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > ask.debian.net is not taking anything away from you. You can ignore it
> > > the way you ignore Debian web forums, for example. ask.d
Hi, Jonathan:
On Saturday 18 December 2010 02:06:27 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Please keep this discussion on-list, that is
> debian-project@lists.debian.org, and avoid top-posting
> (http://idallen.com/topposting.html).
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:51:50AM +, anthony budd wrote:
> > If a s
Hi, Mark, I'm glad you took towards this list the effort of this message:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:21:38 Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I've stayed quiet in this discussion, though several folks have invoked
> my name and ascribed motivations to me that were a little upsetting. I'm
Hi, Julien:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:42:03 Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> From the very start of the Debian Project, Debian has been different
> >> from everything else: different package management tools, different
> >> philosophy, different organization, you
Hi, Marc:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 22:24:56 Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:32:36PM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > In other words: freeze on december the first doesn't mean that if, say,
> > Gnome will publish it's new shiny 1.2
Hi, Jan:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:53:20 Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm interested in the reactions of other distributions. Are they likely
> to change their release cycle to fit yours? Or would you be willing to
> change Ubuntu's release dates if SuSE proposed LTS releases to come out
Hi, Mark:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 23:28:19 Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
[...]
> I think most are waiting to see if Debian and Ubuntu can do this. If we
> can, I am very confident we will get a group of other distributions
> participating in the version harmonisation discussions in the first
> roun
Hi, Julien:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 22:09:04 Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Jesús M. Navarro" wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > Why? I really don't see your point unless you mean for the packager
> > under current conditions where no real branches are allowed on De
Hi, Manoj:
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 02:10:04 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:25:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> > And really, if some logical conclusion is so broken that this
> >> > brokeness has its own name, then ev
Hi, Steve:
On Monday 24 August 2009 09:19:28 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:38:21AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[...]
> > Eh. This translates to: "it is ok that the admin cannot switch back
> > from insserv to oldstyle booting".
> >
> > And that is a statement that I heavily
Hi, Tollef:
On Monday 24 August 2009 10:27:07 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Andreas Barth
>
> | Eh. This translates to: "it is ok that the admin cannot switch back
> | from insserv to oldstyle booting".
> |
> | And that is a statement that I heavily disagree with. I think neither
> | our users nor o
Hi, Stefan:
On Saturday 05 September 2009 17:27:22 Stefan Krueger wrote:
> Hello Debianteam,
>
> I hope you understand my terrible english ;)
>
> It is the fixed release cycles, my opinion ist that 2years are too short,
> because Debian is used more as a server operating system, the people how
> w
Hi, Sylvain:
On Sunday 06 September 2009 17:06:24 Sylvain Sauvage wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jesús M. Navarro, dimanche 6 septembre 2009, 16:34:45 CEST
>
> >[…]
> > So you advocate for a 3 year release. You are aware that with a 2 year
> > release and at least one year of wa
Hi, Steve:
On Thursday 10 September 2009 01:57:14 Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> 4 Marketing stuff:
Yes. There's a kindof "market point" I've been wishing on Debian for
years "knowing" that it simply could happen: certifications and generally
rising attention to commercial producers, both har
Hi, Alexander:
On Thursday 10 September 2009 22:11:24 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jesús M. Navarro schrieb:
> >> 4 Marketing stuff:
>
> [..]
>
> > So, if Debian can be truly so great for companies from IBM to Alfresco,
> > to Oracle (and the
Hi, Bernd:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 19:14:41 Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> > Some months ago Debian asked for sponsored hardware:
> > http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090208
> >
> > I did not read any news about his, so maybe we could use some
> > money for such infra
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 20:10:10 MJ Ray wrote:
> richard newton wrote:
> > The following site appears to be selling a computer with a modified
> > Debian system. I could find nothing on the site about the OS or where I
> > might get the source code.
> > In one of the screenshots I noticed it wa
19 matches
Mail list logo
