Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> JFYI: FrOSCon is looking for Debian-related talks and speakers. If you
> plan to be around Bonn, Germany by August 20th, your contributions are
> more than welcome and it might be a good chance to present your pet
> Debian project to an enthusiast public and spread th
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * René van Bevern:
>
>> The "apt-get into it" is hard to read because the space between each
>> letter is almost as much as the space between each word.
>
> It's also a bit unfortunate because we recommend to use aptitude.
Debian Sarge - with an aptitu
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
>> I invite everyone interested to join the Utnubu Team. Utnubu stands for
> Great name for this! ;-)
>
>> doing what Ubuntu does, just the other way around: We want to take the
>> things Ubuntu does and tha
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Goswin von Brederlow]
>> If anyone is intrested in adapting this drop me a note.
>
> Please provide URL and repository for this source?
Unfortunately it isn't anywhere public. Maybe we should put all the
amd64.debian.ne
tag 155998 - woody
reassign 155998 project,dak
thanks
Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> there will be no more point release for woody and this bug is not
> security-related. You have not even replied to this bug. So I think it
> can be closed, correct?
>
> Greetings
>
>
Juan Carlos Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I bought a Dell Dimension 8400 with a SATA 80 Gb drive. I
> wish to know if the latest version of Debian (sarge) has
> support for SATA disks.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Juan Carlos Muñoz
This is the wrong list for this question and the wrong question.
SATA d
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 04:09:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Notice that what you say, in response to what has been asked over and
>> over, is "my opinion is that changing the Maintainer field on
>> otherwise-unmodified source packages is too
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:29, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I don't agree. This isn't even the case within Debian. Binary-only NMUs
>> > don't modify the source package, even though the binaries are recompiled
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:57:51PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I don't agree. This isn't even the case within Debian. Binary-only NMUs
>> >
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:50:27AM -0700, Jim Bodkikns (Dakotacom) wrote:
>> ALL of the servers chosen to be reinstalled with a debian distro have
>> high performance raid controllers and fail installs due to UDEV issues. (I
>> hate that redhat hand
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The most hideous problem of hotplug/udev is the following:
>>
>> You can't wait for an hotplug/udev event to be done processing. That
>> is always done asynch
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>You can't wait for an hotplug/udev event to be done processing. That
>>is always done asynchron without any feedback of completion.
> This is not correct. Look at the while loop in the init script and and
> the udevsettle sour
Debian Women Please Pass Away <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian-women is an affront to all the men who make
> debian the best linux distro out there. We do not need
> a feminist organization attached to debian.
>
rant rant rant
You are discriminating against a group of people while Debians
phi
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:54:31PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> pe, 2006-06-09 kello 22:43 +0200, Florian Weimer kirjoitti:
>> > * MJ Ray:
>> > > any donations to debian must be given to SPI; or
>> >
>> > Why do you think this is so?
>>
>> Our Con
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Get a life. No, really. Get yourself a family, and start thinking about
> the real important matters.
>
> Though I'll hope for your own sake that you're gay, because I don't
> think you'll be able to find a girlfriend with an attitude like that.
Are y
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:32 -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>> Social politics creeping into Debian is one of the greater mortal
>> dangers that we face.
>
> I surely hope not. Your mail suggests that someone who has severe social
> problems but is techn
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:14:42AM -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>
>> AIUI (please, correct me if I am wrong) the D-I repository is hosted on
>> svn.d.o, a machine belonging to the debian project.
>
> Currently hosted perhaps (I really don't know), bu
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:38:32AM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>> --- Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> > the claim that Debian can be downloaded is a simple statement
>> > of fact which just happens to be true as a byproduct of
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> On the other hand the GPL, and most packages will be GPLed, requires
>> that source be available in one of three ways:
>>
>> 3a) include
Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It is not ok to distribute binary images and say: You want source? Ask
>> Debian for it. That is what I ment with distributing only binary
>> images. Debian do
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> PS: Is it true that Ubuntu things about supplying a 3 year offer for
>> source under 3b so derivates of ubuntu can go sourcelss?
>
> A nice idea, to b
What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
to contain 32bit libs?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 21:20, martin f krafft wrote:
>> I envision a tool (warning: braindump ahead) that we install *by
>> default* on a standard system, which uses cron to wake up once a day
>
> I think that installing it by default is not really an op
Joseph Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> User Here.
>
> RSS would be great, actually. It may not be the flashing red light you're
> looking for, but a feed or two for each suite announcing critical updates
> would be very much appreciated. Maybe you could ship Firefox (or all the
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
>> to contain 32bit libs?
>
> Does this same question apply to other 64bit arches
Mats Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>>
>>>> What does the LSB 3.1 say abo
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:57:22PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Yeah, I hadn't thought of that. But, ehm, since news bits can be
>> > classified per source package, they could be generated once a day, fed
>> > to dak and fr
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> martin f krafft writes ("How to best reach the users of a package?"):
>> [stuff]
>
> Mail to root is sadly not really useful any more (and anyway, does
> someone with a cluster of 1000 machines really want 10 mails a
> week?). And I'm afraid I'm one o
Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Banck, 2006-11-03 12:08:46 +0100 :
>
>> If you grab the .deb referenced from
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/edgy/graphics/kinoplus and look at the
>> control inside, you will find:
>>
>> Package: kinoplus
>> Version: 0.3.5-3build1
>> [...]
>> Maintai
kosovar pirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have tried to download the amd64 version of debain
> from the website ftp.fr.debian with jigdo but it
> always answers that there are 647 file left and it is
> unable to download them. I don't know if this come
> from the jigdo fil
Gabriel McCall writes:
> Dear Debian Package Maintainers,
>
> Is there a definitive way to download packages for a machine that,
> due to it's remote location, does not have an internet connection?
> What I'm looking for is a complete file that would contain all the
> packages that a specific app
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> My goals with changing the membership procedures are:
>>
>> - To turn NM into a more evolutionary process where some privileges and
>>rights are granted earlier in the process and the qualifications for
>> the
>>late
Adeodato Simó writes:
> Hello,
>
> As previously mentioned, the wanna-build team has been looking into
> moving to a public role address instead of a private alias. We now have
> a list on lists.debian.org for this purpose:
>
> debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org
>
> This address should be used
Felipe Sateler writes:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
>> Regarding requests for give-backs, etc., this is the new state of
>> things:
>>
>> * Packages-arch-specific: still bug against âbuildd.debian.orgâ
>>
>> * Bin-NMUs: still debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
>>
>> * Chroot problems, package pr
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> Hello world,
>
> (Please remember that we can only speak for ourselves and not the
> security/release/any other teams, individuals or other sentient beings.)
>
> During the recent discussion about about ia32-libs{,-gtk,-tools} there were
> various requests for removal / co
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:18:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> There is only one thing that DAK might want to adapt to. For most
>> multiarch architectures there is a definite main architecture that
>> most things should be in and then so
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Last I heart s390 planed to drop 31bit support and go fully 64bit.
>
> This was the plan. However I don't know if it is the best solution. The
> fact is: only Debian an
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Please do files bugs about issues you consider blockers for
>> ia32-libs-tools and squeeze and please include if that applies even if
>> there is the old ia32-libs in parallel to it (i.e. when it doesn't ge
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 Ã 14:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a
> écrit :
>> > Do you *really* want to have more reasons?
>>
>> I would settle for one good one. :)
>
> OK, letâs try one that you can understand. Try picturing a br
Yannick writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools
>> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing.
>
> Alas, despite the diversion of the package management
Pierre Habouzit writes:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Yannick writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >
>> >> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:20:08PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The upgrade path to multiarch is for the multiarch i386 deb to
>> Conflicts/Replaces: . Which
>> means ia32-libs or ia32-libs-gtk for the old system or ia32-
>> for the ia
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> and it has numerous RC bugs.
>>
>> Lets see:
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
>>
>> RC bugs: 1
>
> There were 6 bugs when I looked at the page before writing my m
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Bernd Zeimetz writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>>>> and it has numerous RC bugs.
>>>> Lets see:
>>>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs-tools.html
>&
Frans Pop writes:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Meike Reichle wrote:
>> The Debian project has decided to adopt a new policy of time-based
>> development freezes for future releases, on a two-year cycle.
>
> Disappointing to see such an announcement without any prior discussion on
> d-project, d-
Sandro Tosi writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:59, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> No, we freeze on time, we release when ready. Big difference.
>
> and this means a shorter freeze period (as stated in the original
> announce) because?
>From what I understand because the
Martin Wuertele writes:
> * Fred [2009-07-29 06:12]:
>
>> I'd love to see Debian comply to real GNU/FSF freedom. When I visit the
>> website it boasts about how it is free.
>>
>> However, it is far from free while it is offering proprietary software as
>> well as having binary blobs in the kern
Andreas Tille writes:
> I do not think that we could risk as a small non-commercial
> project (compared to the given examples) that our logo we advertised
> for a "not so long" timespan becomes outdated and our users might
> become unhappy about "outdated" T-Shirts etc.
Gives one a good reason t
Rein Tendonsie writes:
> Beste,
>
>
> Momenteel heb ik een dedicated server genomen ergens en men
> zegt er dat ze geen Debian willen instaleren omdat deze niet zou werken
> omwillen van de processor.
>
> Klopt het dat Debian niet werkt onder:
> Intel Atom Dual core 330
>
> http://process
Andreas Barth writes:
> Hi,
>
> currently our policy says that main packages must only (build-)depend
> on main packages, but contrib and non-free packages could use packages
> from contrib and non-free.
>
> In practice build-dependencies from non-free are not used by the
> buildds for two reason
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> This way we could also simply check how many women is involved in
>> Debian project ;)
>
> Or, at least, how many people in the project are willing to claim to
> be women. :)
Ev
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>>> This way we could also simply check how many women is involved in
>>> Debi
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>>> Or, at least, how many people in the project are willing to claim to
>>> be women. :)
>>
>> Every NM sends in his passport [...]
>
> Not true, this is only a fallback mechan
=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - We wont accept[5] applicants who have only one signature on their GPG-key
>> if that signature is made by the advocate. If it has only a signature
>> from the advocate at least another one from the web-of-trust is
>> needed
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:55:43PM +0100]:
>> Do you realy think it is difficult to get a second signature onto your
>> gpg key? Go to one key-signing party and you get 10 even on a small
>> one.
>
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:55:43PM +0100]:
>> > Do you realy think it is difficult to get a second signature onto
>> > your gpg key? Go to one key-signi
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of my 'real problems' is a completely stalled NEW queue; secondhand
...
Hear hear. To the rest of the mail too. Many people would thank you
for a solutiont to this.
Hopefully you can get an answere faster then the 6 month it took to
get third hand kn
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's a little OT, but I think that the upload mechanisms should be
>> enhanced a little to be able to *certify* that a package has been
>> reviewed by many DD. the Uploaders field is not signed, and is not
>> trustfully. I guess this should be a reall
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NEW would still have to be processed by hand, though -- crypto notifications
> still need to be sent, ...
I still fail to see any reason why this has to be done _by_hand_.
Isn't the mail send always the same format? Can't that be totaly
automated into
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> - uploads to NEW need an advocate in addition to the normal signature
>>...
> Hmmm. Seems like it could work, but might still have the issue that finding
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello,
>
> When do you think a Debian AMD-64 will be released ( not Alioth ?).
> We are a lot to expect it will be soon ...
>
> Thanx
With etch in 2006-2010.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Maykel Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On March 25, an Encounter of Free Software will take place at UCI, here
> in Cuba. I'd like to give a talk about the Debian Project.
>
> Have been digging the net searching for use statistics about the
> project. Up to know, I only have:
>
> - Percent of D
62 matches
Mail list logo
