Re: Report from Med@Tel

YI http://identi.ca/debiangis http://twitter.com/debiangis since quite a long time (at least the twitter counterpart). These days it is not so up-to-date, but generally is. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:36:25AM +0900, Horms wrote: > As Etch is currently scheduled for release late in 2006, > this makes May 2006 a very likely end date for Woody security. I would say 'optimistically scheduled' instead of 'currently scheduled' :) -- Franc

Re: Using money to fund real Debian work

Right. Unfortunately, that already happens, totally off the project control. And exactly the same happens in upstream projects, too. So, I'm missing the point. Why situation should be better without d-t? Because it is out of the project control? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why not more 'bits from XXX' on d-d-a?

by DPL or RMs? I think all people would appreciate this little increase in transparency of teams' job. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- Please respect the privacy of this mailing list. Some posts may be declassified 3 years after posting as per http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002

Re: Bits from the DPL: DSA and buildds and DAM, oh my!

That's > why #408150 wasn't solved as i have requested. > I disagree. RT has a very flexible and complex ACL management which lacks in BTS. So it can be potentially used to to ensure public view of some information without full disclosure. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNS

Re: Jury (was Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion)

n elective last resort body is a good idea. Teoretically that role could/should be covered by DPL but a board is something better. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jury (was Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion)

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:50:20AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > A 'probi viri' team should be appinted by voting IMHO, as in the DPL case. s/appinted/appointed/ -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe&

Re: Social committee proposal

nstead, misses a regular board of voted members for standard governance and has instead a single DPL. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: message from Sven Luther

see no good reasons to forward messages instead of pointing to some blog space where he can express his thoughts freely. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

A VERY BIG +1 -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:38:45AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Well, yes and no. I think a freeze every two years is a good > idea. I just do not think that we should freeze in 5 months or so. > +1 -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

So what? [Was: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes]

mon shared idea. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: So what? [Was: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Folks, be pragmatic and do required steps to find a common shared idea. > Ok, the current announce on d-d-a by Luk seems the right first step :-) Well done. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,