> You wouldn't be confusing the directories
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the .elc files,
> and the directories /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the
> .el files, would you?
Julian
i do see now what you are saying. This takes care of most of my
complaints. However, an
Julian
> > [1] It seems that, by default, /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/foo/ don't
> No, this package *does* have a /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/erc/
> directory in it.
We miscommunicated. Yes, the packages *does* have it, but it does not
get added to the load-path. This neglect is true of most
p
Julian
> Why should it be added to the load-path?
Because many emacs functions depend on emacs having access to the
.el files. M-x find-function and M-x find-variable come to mind. If
.el is not in the load-path, emacs will take you the the
nearly-unreadable .elc file when you M-x find-functio
3 matches
Mail list logo
