Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-08 Thread brian m. carlson
cause about a third of machines just won't boot off a USB flash drive for any reason. The BIOS says they will, but it's a lie. I've even owned one of these machines (a fairly recent amd64 box). I would recommend keeping CD images around. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals:

Re: buildd and experimental

2006-02-28 Thread Brian M. Carlson
[Please followup to -project; I am subscribed there, too, so you should *not* Cc me.] On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 12:13 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:59:46AM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > > [0] In case you're unsure, you can check the X-Spam-Status heade

Private copies of list replies (Was: Re: buildd and experimental)

2006-02-28 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 02:46 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > However, the code of conduct seems to > > point out that one should not Cc someone unless they specifically ask > > for it (a guideline that you negle

Re: transfering files between *.debian.org hosts (was: people.debian.org to move to ravel)

2008-08-30 Thread brian m. carlson
support in browsers these days? Firefox supports it in a whitelist approach. However I never tested it. I use Kerberos authentication for my OpenID server, and it works flawlessly with Iceweasel and mod_auth_kerb. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 713 440 7475 | http

Re: New Front Desk members

2005-02-01 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 20:12 +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:41:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:04:36 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > *) English common usage (rather than formal usage) is rapidly and > > > widely ado

Re: disbursement approvals and email privacy

2005-04-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 01:10 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-26 > 18:45]: > > > Details are attached. > > > > Martin has complained, with some justification, that I may have > > disclosed sensitive information by posting this

Re: Consultant entries that will be removed unless there is an email address provided

2005-05-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:10 +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > # Consultant: US > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest someone in the US phones. I am in the US, and I could phone, but I am not a DD. Is this okay? Please let me know soon; this weekend is a national holiday. > > # Consultant: US > > > > >

US Consultants was: Re: Consultant entries that will be removed unless there is an email address provided

2005-06-01 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:10 +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > # Consultant: US > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest someone in the US phones. This company does not have a phone number listed in Directory Assistance, and the number given is "no longer in service". > > # Consultant: US > > > > > > > >

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
lease: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux stonewall 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- no debconf information -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://decoy.wox.org/~bmc> 0x560553E7 "If Jo

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:22:48PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Le mardi 27 août 2002 à 20:00:10, Brian M. Carlson a écrit: > > I have included two telnet sessions: one is with murphy, and one is with > > a friend's machine, which is also a Debian machine running qmail. T

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:15:56AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 +, > "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian should not be using non-free software on its own > > systems. > Debian Project is not FSF. The De

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-27 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:04:30AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:00:10PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > Package: project > > Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: violates Social Contract 1, 4, and 5

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-28 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:44:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:27AM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > > > The subject says it all. qmail is installed on murphy.debian.org. > > > > > > The first thing that pops into my mind as

Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-08-28 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:50:39PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > > Great! I'm glad you know about it. In fact, I'm elated. Now that you > > know, please do something about it. I know you have many machines running > >

Bug#158533: acknowledged by developer (no longer a bug.)

2002-09-03 Thread Brian M. Carlson
te satisfactory, thank you. > From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This is no longer an issue. I just looked, and murphy is now running postfix. Thank you very much! I really appreciate it. Your response was fast and efficient. -- Brian M. Car

Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-10-21 Thread Brian M. Carlson
m that array if my name is present there. It is very difficult to signal to a maintainer and others that one has, for example, provided a patch, when one cannot tag the bug "patch". Thank you. -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-10-21 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:49:45PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:08:08PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > > Due to googling, and information from an anonymous source, I have >

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-10-22 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:31:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:08:08PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > > > > Due to googling, and information from an anonymous source

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-11-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
I have made an effort to contact upstream. I am also actively working on an implementation to replace the Sun RPC code in case that does not work out. It is incomplete, but patches are being accepted. You can check it out with the following command: svn co svn://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/v

Re: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-11-08 Thread Brian M. Carlson
) at that time, so I never got your message. I have dropped TLD blocks since then. I wonder, though, why I didn't get the bounce message in my mailbox. -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Errors in site/Problemas en el sitio

2003-11-25 Thread Brian M. Carlson
ncement will be made, probably to debian-announce or debian-devel-announce. -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Making suggestions

2003-12-12 Thread Brian M. Carlson
this helps. [0] http://www.debian.org/contact [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages [2] http://www.debian.org/intro/organization -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RedHat flaked out on me!!!!

2003-12-18 Thread Brian M. Carlson
Debian Social Contract states that "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software". Debian takes both of those priorities very seriously, and that's why I use it. I am not a Debian Developer, and I speak only for myself. -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature