On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I'm trying to move a thread from -devel.
>
> Ian Jackson responded [1] to part of a consensus discussion on Git
> recommendations. I had said that I think we recommend against the use
> of non-free services like Github but do n
quot;former
official logo" with a nice story about its history or so.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121001104009.gc3...@master.debian.org
best kind of correct.
>
> I second this (I am on the camp of "we need/should keep the restricted
> logo"). I consider this an acceptable compromise.
I second the patch (I was in the camp of "put the bottle logo in a museum".) As
Henrique wrote, the patch is an acc
rsions are
included.
> In my opinion DFSG #10 is not a guideline but a statement giving example
> compared to other DFSG's
I agree that DFSG #10 is just a list of examples, not really a "guideline" as
the "G" in "DFSG".
> so even I feel it is better to
aybe this part should be
dealt with further on debian-legal.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130106174644.ga19...@master.debian.org
one to choose where they post their messages. There's
sufficient social control encouraging people to use the better list.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130621181540.ga18...@master.debian.org
that could reflect
bad on Debian's reputation.
Approaches I could support :
- post the bans with reasons on debian-private
- or maintain a list of bans with reasons in a text file on a Debian machine
where DDs can read this info.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:20:27PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 19:33 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This led to a philosophical debate about whether bans should be made
> > &
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:58:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:33:34PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This led to a philosophical debate about whether bans shou
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:46:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Bart Martens wrote:
> > > I suggest we keep things civil, with respect for the persons involved.
> > > It's
> > > really not
at do you suggest?
DDs with strong keys can help the locked out DDs with key signing [1] and with
temporarily sponsoring important/urgent packages uploads [2]. I'm hereby
offering this help myself now.
[1] : https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers
[2] : http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maint
e this would reduce the value of the new keys to the weakness of the
1024 bit keys.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://li
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:23:47AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bart Martens:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:57:43AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
> > >
> > > >So, what do you suggest?
> > > Pers
ing web of trust based on the 1024 bit
keys, but one should realize that it is already weakened, regardless of how we
introduce 4096 bit keys.
> What we need is a way to confirm that you're talking to the same person
> you've met previously and confirm that that is his new key.
gt; > old key they have already signed, with no need to meet them in person.
>
> I'm open to that if and only if the new keys have proper transition
> statements.
I would never sign new keys based on transition statements.
> And if the original signatures were *really* done
>
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:38 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:39:43PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > He didn't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. It was clear to me that
> > he was speaking as a developer, not as the DPL.
>
> But he has repeatedly suggested when speaking as
with Ubuntu
or other derivatives. But I think that joint efforts should make Debian
better. If not then I wonder if Debian should do the efforts.
> So I'd propose to extend the changelog format
I have not yet studied your proposal, because I want to get some bugs
fixed before etch releases. :)
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 00:40 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> the strongest
> leader is someone who leads many other strong people to push in the
> same direction, building consensus.
Yes, absolutely.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Note that the Debian project is very volunteer-driven, and money
is a sensitive subject. For now I prefer to stay out of flamewars about
money in Debian, and focus on the interesting parts: the software.
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
. If you feel
that some packages in stable need an update, then you are very welcome
to suggest an update by following the procedure described here [2].
[1]: http://www.debian.org/
[2]:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable
Regards,
Bart Martens
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> contrary to popular belief and self-delusion, 'stable+backports' is NO
> LONGER STABLE.
That is of course true.
> the only 'advantage' to using 'stable+backports' over 'stable+some
> packages from unstable or testing' is that you don't hav
sts for Debian users:
http://lists.debian.org/users.html
Other ways to find support:
http://www.debian.org/support
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:06 +0200, walter wrote:
> I've
> lost a lot of time and plastic trying to download your dvds, cds. All
> corrupt. It seems you or somebody else don't want people know about your
> distro.
What were the problems you experienced ?
Regards,
Bart Ma
m_pubkey.asc
I guess that it's not so difficult to find two other volunteering DD's.
Right ? :)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 09:55 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 22:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > The current 3 people in the DM keyring agreed to be beta testers of the
> > process, and I don't anticipate us adding more people until everything is
> > fu
on that helps in any way,
> thats why Im not doing it.
Well, that's why I offered my help to joeyh. :)
>
> IMO the whole GR is just wrong,
Hmm... let's not go into that. :)
> but that doesnt mean we should ignore
> whats written in it.
Yes, the voted GR must be re
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 11:04 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I'm sure that the intentions are good, but Joerg has a point about these
> > three DM's. Maybe it is better to replace these three DM registrations
http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
all know that this is not about the work of the DM candidates.
> and not in the DM keyring maintenance team.
I'm not blaming the DM keyring maintenance team for having a different
view on the liberties that come with being a member of the DM keyring
maintenance team.
Regards,
Bart Marten
t; beta.
That would be more than I expect in short term. I think that it is OK
to officially start using the DM keyring before all documentation and
tools are ready. As long as granting upload rights to non-DD's is done
following the rules of the voted GR.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 14:57 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The "good reasons" for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions
> > to the DM keyring are
>
> Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Key
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:22 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> Dear DD's,
>
> I think that Joerg was very reasonable with this message:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/10/msg00115.html
>
> The debate that followed doesn't seem to lead to a solution
way to get Debian GNU/Linux is documented here:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/
There are also vendors in South Africa listed:
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/#za
Hope this helps,
Bart Martens
>
> Regards,
>
> PNJ IT Solutions for Vaalpark High School.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
ilar roles (...) These people will
initially be: (...) The team will be known as the Debian Maintainer
Keyring team. Changes to the team may be made by the DPL under the
normal rules for delegations."
So the GR text doesn't seem to require a public discussion nor a public
announcement.
Rega
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 02:51:02PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2025 8:45:40 AM Mountain Standard Time Ian
> Jackson wrote:
> > Looking at the responses to Sean and my draft GR proposal last
> > month, it seems that a several people were upset that we were
> > trying to use
35 matches
Mail list logo
