On Friday, March 7, 2025 11:33:53 AM MST Simon Josefsson wrote:
> pan...@disroot.org writes:
> > I urge Debian to rethink its decision to officially include non-free
> > firmware and correct the social contract. Instead of making non-free
> > firmware the default, Debian should ensure that users co
On 3/7/25 12:42, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Friday, March 7, 2025 11:33:53 AM MST Simon Josefsson wrote:
> pan...@disroot.org writes:
> > I urge Debian to rethink its decision to officially include non-free
> > firmware and correct the social contract. Instead of making non-free
> > firmw
Dear Debian Community,
I am Deep Pandya from Gujarat, India, and a long-time Debian user. I
migrated from Windows to Ubuntu in 2013 and later explored the
philosophy of the GNU project and the history of the free software
movement. After trying GNU-endorsed Trisquel and PureOS, I finally
land
pan...@disroot.org writes:
> I urge Debian to rethink its decision to officially include non-free
> firmware and correct the social contract. Instead of making non-free
> firmware the default, Debian should ensure that users consciously
> choose to install it while being made aware of the implicat
Hello Debian-Devel mailing list =D
imho, an interesting topic. In conjunction with [1] my first notion
was: We should not guide that proprietary software is insecure.
That's not correct, i.e. in the case of non-free-firmware it is nearly
equivalent to say that the usage of proprietary hardware i
5 matches
Mail list logo
