Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]

Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > A serious suggestion: it is not necessary for Debian to package fortune files at all. I absolutely disagree with that. The fortune package is completely nonfunctional without any fortune files. True, I could download fortune files from anywhere on the internet, and even

Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]

On 2022-11-24 at 04:29, Gerardo Ballabio wrote: > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > >> A serious suggestion: it is not necessary for Debian to package >> fortune files at all. > > I absolutely disagree with that. > > The fortune package is completely nonfunctional without any fortune > files. True, I