Hi,
2013/12/10 Enrico Zini :
> it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google
> recruiters.
> I am toying with the idea of contacting companies with aggressive
> recruiting policies like Google asking them to please leave us in peace,
> and offering instead to maintain a w
> 2013/12/10 Enrico Zini :
>
> > it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google
> > recruiters.
>
> > I am toying with the idea of contacting companies with aggressive
> > recruiting policies like Google asking them to please leave us in peace,
> > and offering instead to m
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz dijo [Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:19:32AM -0500]:
> Actually they have tried many times even before I became DD. I know
> other non-DD maintainers who have been bothered by them too. I don't see
> a general solution for this, since some may like it. In my case I've
> told all recru
(This is a bit off-topic for the Debian list; I hope people won't mind
me asking opinions here though.)
I'm being asked for advice on encouraging contributions by the people
behind a couple of "community-ish" websites which I use regularly.
There's a lot of work to be done to improve the attractiv
On 12/12/2013 06:44 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
(This is a bit off-topic for the Debian list; I hope people won't mind
me asking opinions here though.)
I'm being asked for advice on encouraging contributions by the people
behind a couple of "community-ish" websites which I use regularly.
There's a
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> * It would clearly be sensible to appoint a licence steward in the
> GPLv3 sense. If the current project leadership lack free software
> credibility, could SPI serve as licence steward ?
On this I can not comment.
> What instructions/d
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (This is a bit off-topic for the Debian list; I hope people won't mind
> me asking opinions here though.)
>
> I'm being asked for advice on encouraging contributions by the people
> behind a couple of "community-ish" websites which I u
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On 12/12/2013 06:44 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * It would clearly be sensible to appoint a licence steward in the
> >GPLv3 sense. If the current project leadership lack free software
> >credibility, could SPI serve
Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
> > for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
> > if they aren't, the
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
> for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and
> if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception).
> (The main program I'm
Paul Tagliamonte writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:44:19PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
> > modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > published by
Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> >> [AGPLv3] is the least-free license currently approved by the OSI.
> >
> > Just out of interest
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson
>> wrote:
>> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable
>> > for AGPLv3 provided that its sub
Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> I am fine with the stated purpose of the AGPLv3, however I do not think the
> actual implementation is compatible with free software.
>
> There have been no official clarification how the AGPLv3 is supposed
> to work in a lo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:35:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Of course that only applies to future versions of the GNU GPL. It's
> not possible to switch from AGPL to GPL (or the other way) with that
> wording.
Indeed, just a datapoint for what other projects do. I'd be fine to
include in my De
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:45:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"):
> > I am fine with the stated purpose of the AGPLv3, however I do not think the
> > actual implementation is compatible with free software.
>
> Perhaps I haven't l
16 matches
Mail list logo
