Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/23/2012 10:21 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > I have spoken to quite a lot of lay users, none of them knew the > difference between debian.net and debian.org. The fact that debian.net redirects to www.debian.org really doesn't help users to get the difference. IMHO, debian.net's webpage sho

Debian Maintainers Keyring changes

2012-06-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been activated: andr...@noteng.no Full name: Andreas Noteng Added key: 1662F3FE0EF53DE5E6CE0031B446EEA8329A945A dae...@poleboy.de Full name: Stefan Potyra jmccro...@gmail.com Full name: Jonathan McCrohan Add

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:01:56PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > While the current practice is useful for the introduction of unofficial > project services, it may involve certain risks. One risk is that > outsiders can not and will not distinguish between debian.net and > debian.org entries.

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * Martin Zobel-Helas [2012-06-22 23:01:56 CEST]: > The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly > entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking > comments on a proposal to alter this practice. In theory I agree that the policy change makes mu

Re: Outdated version of Zoph in Debian

2012-06-24 Thread Jeroen Roos
On 24-06-12 02:59, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > I'm asking for advice. To be honest, #556573 [1] needs some luck to be > fixed for Wheezy. There's an usability bug, as one dependency of Zoph is > not even packaged. As I see, the NEW queue is long, even if I package > that, may not reach testi

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Sun Jun 24, 2012 at 13:24:07 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! > > * Martin Zobel-Helas [2012-06-22 23:01:56 CEST]: > > The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly > > entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking > > comments on a propo

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:21:44PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > > > > I just want to get rid of the plain usage (3rd level) of the debian.net > > zone. This zone only confuses most of our users. > > Hello Martin, > > Indeed, the meaning of th

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > We could also publish > in developers-reference and www.debian.net a best-practice usage > guidelines that *suggests* how to behave to minimize confusion and what > notices to add to any announcement postings to d-d-a, the blogsphere and > social networks in ord