Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:35:20AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> [Travel sponsorship idea where Debian underwrites travel
> sponsorship, allowing it to be allocated earlier, with DebConf
> eventually bearing the total cost.]
So, the idea seems to have support, which is good.
As people point
Raphael Geissert wrote at 2012-06-21 20:09 -0500:
> On Thursday 21 June 2012 18:19:16 Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > b) You announced this to d-d-a and your blog/planet. However, I believe
> > that there are readers of those media -esp. planet- that are not that
> > much involved into Debian practices
green wrote at 2012-06-22 08:57 -0500:
> "official" channels. So I agree with Raphael on this; it would be nice to
Sorry Raphael, I meant "I agree with Faidon".
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On 22.06.2012 15:57, green wrote:
>
> For what it is worth, I was puzzled by the "announcement" because it seemed
> to be on an "official" domain but did not seem to be announced through
> "official" channels. So I agree with Raphael on this; it would be nice to
> make that clear in annou
Arno Töll wrote at 2012-06-22 13:08 -0500:
> Actually, Raphael sent it to debian-devel-announce which addresses,
> well, developers. They are supposed to know the difference.
>
> Having that said, this list is a established mean to broadcast
> debian.net services (as a random example [1]).
Thanks
Hi,
The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly
entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking
comments on a proposal to alter this practice.
While the current practice is useful for the introduction of unofficial
project services, it may involve certa
Hi,
letting alone the expected discussion or its outcome as a whole:
On 22.06.2012 23:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> * Going forward, new user-associated debian.net entries will be added as
> 4th-level (or 5th-level, see last section) records in the debian.net
> zone in the form of $entry.$
Hi,
On Fri Jun 22, 2012 at 23:23:34 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> By the way, as a random note: The Apache Software Foundation requires
> that new projects go through Incubator which follows a similar principle
if we end up with a proper policy, why not do a thing like this in Debian too?
Cheers,
M
Hi Martin,
On Freitag, 22. Juni 2012, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly
> entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking
> comments on a proposal to alter this practice.
I think your proposal is horrible for debian
9 matches
Mail list logo
