Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent issues
> do not share their concerns, except with the contact point mentioned
> in 3.
>
> [...] 5. is, however, anti-transparency, and IMO against
> our ethics. Such a position statement cannot be ma
* Stefano Zacchiroli [2012-04-09 14:02:02 CEST]:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > So, I wrote a draft - mainly based on the one [4] created for Ubuntu
> > by Matt Zimmerman with the help of Mary Gardiner, Valerie Aurora
> > and Benjamin Mako Hill - and I'd l
On 04/12/12 07:37, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian
Position on Software Patents" to our website:
http://www.debian.org/legal/patent
This document includes both a position and a policy regarding software
patents. It states:
1.
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
> I'm very much unhappy with the policies put down here, looking at the
> amount of patents Microsoft is holding, it making developing any
> software a challenge; that results in the Debian repos being
> --emtpy--.
For the - at least - 15th time
On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
I'm very much unhappy with the policies put down here, looking at the
amount of patents Microsoft is holding, it making developing any
software a challenge; that results in the Debian repos being
--em
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:08:32 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli [2012-04-09 14:02:02 CEST]:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > > So, I wrote a draft - mainly based on the one [4] created for Ubuntu
> > > by Matt Zimmerman with the help of Ma
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:59 +0530, dE . wrote:
> On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
[...]
> >> As a result I suggest, restricting the download and hosting of such
> >> software in the US.. since software patents practically only apply
On 04/12/12 20:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:59 +0530, dE . wrote:
On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
[...]
As a result I suggest, restricting the download and hosting of such
software in the US.. since software
Phil wrote:
> If it is deemed that the clarification is needed, then adding 'too' is
> not the way to do it -- instead we could go for:
>
> adding 'also' after 'we':
>
> ... technical in nature, we also value and encourage contributions ...
>
> or perhaps adding 'as well' where you were sugges
Hi,
Le 12/04/2012 12:22, Moray Allan a écrit :
> Phil wrote:
>> Le 12/04/2012 08:08, Gerfried Fuchs a écrit :
>>> Maybe I'm too picky, and you can base it on me not being a native
>>> speaker - but then, most people that will read it might be non-native
>>> speakers.
>> If it is deemed that the
10 matches
Mail list logo
