* Craig Small:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I wonder if this is the result of corporate pressure, or if this is
>> somehow encouraged by the de-facto list policy.
> You'll never find me using a corporate address. The IP and surveilence
> rules are just plai
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is mostly an etiquette question, and I'm not sure if this is the
> right mailing list to post to.
It is an interesting topic.
As a freelance consultant, my personal mail domain is the only
domain that is going to stay. I have
* MJ Ray:
> At least as I understand it (IANAL), English business emails should
> contain a signature with extended contact information (thanks to the
> Business Names Act, Companies Act, Distance Selling Regs and some
> other stuff that covers the gaps).
That stems from a European directive on b
On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I was just curious about proper etiquette. I'm still a bit worried
> that corporatelessness is implicitly requested by the community.
I dont think corporatelessness in email addresses is requested by anyone.
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUB
4 matches
Mail list logo
