On 2010-07-12, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Or they should work closely with the porters to notify them about build logs
> which smell like issues porters should look into.
I would consider that 'caring for the port'.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
[Andreas Tille, 2010-07-13]
> I'm seriosely asking for more discipline on this list and wonder whether
> we could establish some punishment system like: You have to fix a RC bug
> for every OT posting on debian-private.
+1
(/me who is tired of replying in private about OT mails... but will
cont
[Clint Adams]
> Shouldn't it be the responsibility of the buildd admin (if, for some
> reason, the buildd admin is not a porter) to notify an
> architecture's porters of any porting issues manifesting themselves
> in a package build?
You bring up the important topic of expectations on who is resp
Dear Petter,
2010/7/13, Petter Reinholdtsen :
> I believe it is a good idea for Debian to drop
> the lesser used architectures to ensure they do not slow down the rate
> of improvement in Debian.
I am proud of the amount of architectures Debian supports. I also
understand its overhead, but I thin
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:05:45PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Shouldn't it be the responsibility of the buildd admin
> (if, for some reason, the buildd admin is not a porter)
> to notify an architecture's porters of any porting issues
> manifesting themselves in a package build?
>
I think you ma
Hector Oron writes:
> Maintainers are the ones that know best their software, they are
> encouraged to maintain their packages in best manner following a strict
> policy and following strict verification and validation procedures. In
> Debian, it is requested to have that software built in all ar
Hello,
2010/7/13, Russ Allbery :
> But if those steps fail and it gets to the point where I'm actively asking
> for help, my customary experience has been to never get any reply. Mail
> seems to just disappear into a black hole. Sometimes this is true even
> for a requeue request, although mostl
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2010/7/13, Russ Allbery :
> > But if those steps fail and it gets to the point where I'm actively asking
> > for help, my customary experience has been to never get any reply. Mail
> > seems to just disappear into a black hole. Sometimes this is true even
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:27:42PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 2010/7/13, Russ Allbery :
> > > But if those steps fail and it gets to the point where I'm actively asking
> > > for help, my customary experience has been to never get any reply. Mail
> >
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:27:42PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If porters would like psuedopackages for their architecture to
> > track requests, that can be arranged. [Y'all just need to ask,
> > point me at some bugs which should be assigned to the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:50:03PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:27:42PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If porters would like psuedopackages for their architecture to
> > > track requests, that can be arranged. [Y'all just
Hello,
2010/7/14, Aurelien Jarno :
>> You can reassign bugs to multiple packages or use affects to indicate
>> that a bug affects multiple packages, so this isn't really a problem.
>
> What we really need here is the push method. If the information arrives
> directly on the porter mailing list it
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> What we really need here is the push method.
There's nothing stoping porters from pulling the status of bugs which
need to be handled by the porters and forwarding them to their mailing
list; since the maintainer of the psuedopackage would presumably be
Le Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Hector Oron a écrit :
>
> 2010/7/13, Petter Reinholdtsen :
> > I believe it is a good idea for Debian to drop
> > the lesser used architectures to ensure they do not slow down the rate
> > of improvement in Debian.
>
> I am proud of the amount of architec
14 matches
Mail list logo
