also sprach Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [2010.04.01.1757
+0200]:
> A blog is more or less a real time media: Something happens and soon
> after that it should be mentioned there. The newsletter has the
> luxury to wait a bit longer, and also show the outcome of a
> discussion.
Wordpress implemen
Micah Anderson writes:
> Clint Adams writes:
>> [Adding and M-F-T-ing -project]
[...]
>> Were you there? Were Debian funds spend on this endeavor? What
>> happened there? Most importantly, why is it all so secretive?
>
> Did I miss a response to these questions? I'm interested to know the
> an
I've seen in your other post that you and Tolimar are already organizing
some meeting to have a common work-flow, so I'll just comment on a minor
point and wait for your synergies to sprout :)
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:24:12PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> If somebody wants to volunteer to be adde
Hi,
currently our policy says that main packages must only (build-)depend
on main packages, but contrib and non-free packages could use packages
from contrib and non-free.
In practice build-dependencies from non-free are not used by the
buildds for two reasons:
1. (mostly historical) we need to
Hello,
[switching to debian-project]
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:57 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
> package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
>
> How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
This fir
Hi all,
A new DPL will be elected soon. All candidates have good platforms,
but's let's be realistic, they probably already have a job(!), so they
have "limited" amount of time to make their platform happen.
My first 2¢ is: Do call for help
¨
You can't make it happ
Hi all,
Let's imagine that Debian (and/or the DPL), need and want to accomplish
a task, but no one is stepping up. There are many examples: Debian
design, Debian News, reviewing Wikipedia articles related to Debian,
Release notes, testing the release, etc.
The problem with those tasks is that the
Hi Andreas and everybody,
I think that it would be acceptable to ask the maintainers of packages for
which auto-building is not allowed their opinion about dropping support for
them. This would solve the problem entirely, and aren't these packages rare
cornercases? I could not think of examples wh
8 matches
Mail list logo
