Hello Stephen,
On Friday 22 May 2009 16:30:03 Stephen Gran wrote:
[...]
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
>
* Stephen Gran [2009-05-22 23:30:03 CEST]:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debian.org machines or
On Fri, 22 May 2009 22:30:03 +0100
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
> packages.debian.org, and it looks like it collects some useful mail
> from automated scripts on various debian.org machines (primarily
> ries), and about 1000 spams a day
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debia
> I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems pretty clear so far
> that the domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail
> from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
As I understand it, @packages.d.o is the standard way of contacting
the maintainers of a package in an e
On Friday 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
I always use it to CC the maintainer(s) of a package I reassign a bug to,
or if I want to CC a package maintainer on some discussion.
For me it's the most natural address to use,
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ri
On Friday 22 May 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> Maybe a list of packages that do use it and an address to email for
> those who want to start using it at a later date?
That would defeat its purpose. It is not about which maintainers use it,
but about who uses it to contact maintainers.
Cheers,
FJP
On May 22, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> @packages.d.o is known to be "the easiest way to get in touch with a
> maintainer," and is often used when CC'ing maintainers of multiple packages.
Then it needs to be fixed, soon, because it the last few weeks I started
receiving a huge quantity of trivially
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
> The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
> keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
> and the subsequent translations.
This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Simó said:
> I use it all th
Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
> day from elsewhere. I haven't done an exhaustive survey,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
>and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
>on various debian.org machines (primar
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said:
> Some packages even emit it at runtime:
>
> Other packages, including reportbug --kudos, BUGBASH, and debconf-updatepo
> directly send mail there.
Good to know.
> Anyway, this feels like it may be a false optimisation to me. You know
> that p,d.o get
13 matches
Mail list logo
