On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
You conflate low mailing list activity with “activity problems”. At
s/low/decreasing/
least, that's the best way I can understand your motivation in posting
these reports.
In principle, yes.
If you have a better explanation of what you mean by “acti
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
In another post, Andreas called it "a quick and dirty helper for a
talks of mine at DebConf and I never thought that it became that
popular". It isn't that popular,
... popular amongst DebConf attendees.
but spamming N debian lists with the
graphs does ten
]] Martin Zobel-Helas
| * Debconf 3
liw took this picture, iirc, so I assume he has the JPEG or RAW lying
around.
| They should have reasonable size for printing on large-size posters.
|
| Hints and links welcome, as well as eMailed once.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just p
ma, 2009-01-19 kello 09:06 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen kirjoitti:
> ]] Martin Zobel-Helas
>
> | * Debconf 3
>
> liw took this picture, iirc, so I assume he has the JPEG or RAW lying
> around.
Already sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > You conflate low mailing list activity with “activity problems”. At
>
> s/low/decreasing/
>
> > least, that's the best way I can understand your motivation in posting
> > these reports.
>
> In principle, yes.
That's the pre
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/authorstat_jr.pdf
http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/authorstat_med.pdf
Here the difference is very clear and the conclusion that Debian
Junior needs definitely help. Other list show similar decreasi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:02 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
> I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
> description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
> illuminating.
I think Andreas meant "active people" rather than what you seem to be
interpreting "activists"
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
I've posted to -legal about the confusing nature of the above
description, the jump to "activists" and how to make the analysis more
illuminating.
I think Andreas meant "active people" rather than what you seem to be
interpreting "activists" to be.
Yes.
Dear Debian Team!
When will be the Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 "Lenny" distribution release
available?
Thank you for your answer.
Best regards:
Garamszegi Tamás
Hi,
On Mon Jan 19, 2009 at 14:19:28 +0100, tamas.garamsz...@polimerieuropa.com
wrote:
> Dear Debian Team!
>
> When will be the Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 "Lenny" distribution release
> available?
"When it's ready". :-)
There are currently 101 release critical bugs concerning the next
release, so w
Hi,
On Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thank you. Sincerely. I think this will mean we can have a better
> conversation later and get at the heart of the problem and hopefully make
> a more lasting decision that we don't have to keep revisiting.
>
> Dropping something like this
On Mon Jan 19 14:19, tamas.garamsz...@polimerieuropa.com wrote:
> When will be the Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 "Lenny" distribution release
> available?
As Martin says, there are still bugs we are trying to squash. The main
blocker, however, is the next RC of the installer, which is what we
expect to re
12 matches
Mail list logo
