On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> He's doing more than interpret the results. He claims they are ambigous,
> and that his "interpretation" is based on his speculation on what he thinks
> the developers want.
No, instead of whining and acusing people you should try t
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:26:20PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > We're having a serious discussion, and you guys are adding noise. If you
> > > want to make jokes, please at least start a separate thread.
> ...
> That goes for
Robert Millan wrote:
> So, I'll stop now. Do not think this means the problem just got "solved". I
> only do it because I expect we can have a healthy discussion about it after
> Lenny is released.
Thanks.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with.
Thanks for your courage and honesty.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
With the upload of debian-maintainers version 1.52, the following
changes to the keyring have been made:
i...@jhr-online.de
Full name: Jan Hauke Rahm
Added key: D26FB242AAA167AC310E69F718EA7A5DE0FC710D
michael.ha...@ovgu.de
Full name: Michael Hanke
Added key: 13A481525A76CE3A9EDB
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> How about you going elsewhere until Lenny is released, then coming back
> as soon as that happens and start working on what is left to fix then?
> (Not right before a release, right after a release for a change.)
>
A VERY BIG +1
Hm.
It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or
less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that
once that happens, they are going to explode (the discussions) all over
the lists.
I suggested the creation of the DiscussionsAfterLenny wiki page a
On Tue Jan 13 17:39, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> So, I'm interested in knowing if people would be fine with making a list
> of these "big issues" we have to discuss, and trying to give them
> "slots", as in putting them in some order that makes sense. Also, IMHO,
> having one or two (per-topic) people "
Robert Millan writes:
> So, I'll stop now. Do not think this means the problem just got
> "solved". I only do it because I expect we can have a healthy
> discussion about it after Lenny is released.
>
> Best wishes to everyone,
Thank you. Sincerely. I think this will mean we can have a bette
Hi,
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> apologies for the cross-post, choose your favorite one of the two to reply.
> search.debian.org[1], a slightly patched xapian-omega instance, is
> looking for a kind DD (or a team?) to pick it up. Some more improvements
> to the language support would be desirable, tha
I don't know how many of you caught sight of this article about Ubuntu in the
New York Times, its an amusingly stilted read.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html
I know its now considered bad form to whine about Ubuntu's chronic success at
taking credit for Debian's achiev
Ean Schuessler writes:
> I don't know how many of you caught sight of this article about Ubuntu
> in the New York Times, its an amusingly stilted read.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html
It's a dreadful article. It's characteristic of the worst sort of
technological r
Robert Millan writes ("Re: Results of the Lenny release GR"):
> Actually, I accept the outcome of the last vote. I don't like that we made
> an exception for firmware, but the developers chose to make one so there's no
> point in arguing about it.
>
> On the other hand, it appears that the Secret
Adeodato Simó writes ("Scheduling project-wide post-lenny discussions?"):
> It seems we have a number of projet-wide discussions that we've more or
> less agreed to postpone until lenny is out. I have a moderate fear that
> once that happens, they are going to explode (the discussions) all over
>
On Tue Jan 13 20:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We have a number of constitutional proposals:
>
> - Require Secretary to include position statement URLs in ballots
> - Require Secretary to assist people with ballot drafting and
>empower Secretary to briefly delay votes to do so
> -
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Robert Millan [Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:22:58 +0100]:
>
>> Currently, the only solution I see is that we ask the developers what they
>> think, and hold another vote.
>
> Yes, I'm realizing myself there is not going to be another way. :-(
>
> Proposal: hand Robert Millan
Robert Millan wrote:
> OTOH, if you just tell me to "go elsewhere", I'm sorry but I don't want to
> look the other way while the project destroys its reputation for having a
> commitment to freedom, a democratic system and a set of principles.
The only one who works on destroying the project at t
17 matches
Mail list logo
