Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 16 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 04:24:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least >> several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is: > > Let me observe that the fact that "several

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 16 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:38:56 -0600]: > >> That does not seem to make sense. Either you have >> 'none of this non-free crap in the archive ever' >> or you have >> 'the release team downgrades these bugs and includes non-

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I think we can be reasonably sure that the current spate of > discussions is about releasing Lenny. For this action, any of the > ballot options will have a distinct decision; and the ballot should > have _all_ the possible courses of

Hi its me Joyce, how are you today?

2008-11-16 Thread Joyce Donaldson
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi,i have accpted you as my gud friend,so reply and let us knw each other more ok am Joy and u? - Joyce Donaldson

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 16 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 15 novembre 2008 à 19:39 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : >> > Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least >> > several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is: >> > >> > i Do we require source f

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 16 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 16 November 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I think we can be reasonably sure that the current spate of >> discussions is about releasing Lenny. For this action, any of the >> ballot options will have a distinct decision; and the ballot

search.debian.org

2008-11-16 Thread Jochen Peters
hi debian team, some problems with your webserver? http://search.debian.org/apache2-default/?q=hardware Just a "it work's" site not ideal. (22:37 Germany) I wish al of you a good start of the week :-) Jochen -- .-.jochen.homelinux.org oo| /`'\ (\_;/) Mit der Zeit kommt der Tux auch

Re: search.debian.org

2008-11-16 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Jochen, thanks for alerting us of the problem. Jochen Peters wrote: > some problems with your webserver? > http://search.debian.org/apache2-default/?q=hardware > Just a "it work's" site not ideal. (22:37 Germany) search.debian.org had been a placeholder (saying "use google") for years. About

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I do not think throwing options out because they are not of a > narrow and limited scope is right. The proposer and sponsors can > withdraw them, if they think the scope is too broad for the problem at > hand. No one els

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

2008-11-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Nov 16 2008, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> I do not think throwing options out because they are not of a >> narrow and limited scope is right. The proposer and sponsors can >> withdraw them, if they think the scope is